LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] div64_64 support
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:02:50 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702262348140.23355@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070226143127.5c74bec9@freekitty>
On Feb 26 2007 13:28, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>
>> ./arch/arm26/lib/udivdi3.c
>> ./arch/sh/lib/udivdi3.c
>> ./arch/sparc/lib/udivdi3.S
>>
>> should not this be consolidated too?
>
>Hmm. Those are the GCC internal versions, that are picked up but
>doing divide in place. Do we want to allow general 64 bit in kernel to
>be easily used? It could cause sloppy slow code, but it would look
>cleaner.
Then our reviewers should catch it, and if not, the janitors will
(/me winks at R.P.J.Day and trivial@).
>@@ -134,7 +112,7 @@
> */
> do {
> x1 = x;
>- x = (2 * x + (uint32_t) div64_64(a, x*x)) / 3;
>+ x = (2 * x + (u32) (a / x*x)) / 3;
Eye see a bug.
Previously there was div64_64(a, x*x) which is equivalent to
(a)/(x*x), or just: a/(x^2). But now you do a/x*x, which is
equivalent to a*x/x (in the domain of real numbers). Furthermore,
a/x*x is a-(a%x), which does not even remotely match a/(x^2).
Please keep the math intact, thank you ;-)
Jan
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-26 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-24 1:05 Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-24 16:19 ` Sami Farin
2007-02-26 19:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-26 19:39 ` David Miller
2007-02-26 20:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-02-26 21:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-27 1:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-27 3:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-26 22:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-26 23:02 ` Jan Engelhardt [this message]
2007-02-26 23:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-27 0:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-02-27 0:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-27 0:14 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-02-27 6:21 ` Dan Williams
2007-03-03 2:31 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-05 23:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-06 0:25 ` David Miller
2007-03-06 13:36 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-06 14:04 ` [RFC] div64_64 support II Andi Kleen
2007-03-06 17:43 ` Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
2007-03-06 18:25 ` David Miller
2007-03-06 18:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-06 13:34 ` [RFC] div64_64 support Andi Kleen
2007-03-06 14:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-06 14:45 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-06 15:10 ` Roland Kuhn
2007-03-06 18:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-06 19:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-06 20:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-06 21:53 ` Sami Farin
2007-03-06 22:24 ` Sami Farin
2007-03-07 0:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-07 0:05 ` David Miller
2007-03-07 0:05 ` Sami Farin
2007-03-07 16:11 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-03-07 18:32 ` Sami Farin
2007-03-08 18:23 ` asm volatile [Was: [RFC] div64_64 support] Sami Farin
2007-03-08 22:01 ` asm volatile David Miller
2007-03-06 21:58 ` [RFC] div64_64 support David Miller
2007-03-06 22:47 ` [PATCH] tcp_cubic: faster cube root Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-06 22:58 ` cube root benchmark code Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-07 6:08 ` Update to " Willy Tarreau
2007-03-08 1:07 ` [PATCH] tcp_cubic: use 32 bit math Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 2:55 ` David Miller
2007-03-08 3:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 3:51 ` David Miller
2007-03-10 11:48 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-12 21:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-13 20:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-21 18:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-21 19:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-21 19:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-21 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] div64_64 optimization Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-21 20:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] tcp: cubic optimization Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-22 19:11 ` David Miller
2007-03-22 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] div64_64 optimization David Miller
2007-03-08 4:16 ` [PATCH] tcp_cubic: use 32 bit math Willy Tarreau
2007-03-07 4:20 ` [PATCH] tcp_cubic: faster cube root David Miller
2007-03-07 12:12 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-07 19:33 ` David Miller
2007-03-06 18:50 ` [RFC] div64_64 support H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0702262348140.23355@yvahk01.tjqt.qr \
--to=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--subject='Re: [RFC] div64_64 support' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).