LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Engelhardt <>
To: Martin Steigerwald <>
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>, Con Kolivas <>
Subject: Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing?
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:07:23 +0200 (MEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704291606450.22744@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Apr 27 2007 10:44, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>Hi Con and Ingo!
>What would be the best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing? I used 
>1000HZ for a long time, but use 300HZ since 2.6.20. This worked well 
>enough for sd-0.46 and previous versions and ck patches...



      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-29 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-27  8:44 Martin Steigerwald
2007-04-28 19:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-29 14:07 ` Jan Engelhardt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0704291606450.22744@yvahk01.tjqt.qr \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing?' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).