LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] MTD: fix DOC2000/2001/2001PLUS build error
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:21:30 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702061615480.8424@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170806622.29759.1063.camel@pmac.infradead.org>



On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> It isn't that far off, and we could improve it if we wanted to. In
> _general_ it's quite good already.

I agree that it's close to hierarchical. But it's literally the exceptions 
that get you.

Let me mention (again) USB_STORAGE and ATA.

They are not "under" SCSI. Making them do that would be insane.

But yes, you can do hierarchies by adding "pseudo-variables": as 
mentioned several times, we could actually split CONFIG_SCSI into two 
separate ones: CONFIG_SCSI that selects the core infrastructure, and 
CONFIG_SCSI_DRIVER that actually controls the "hierarchical visibility". 

Then CONFIG_SCSI_DRIVER (and USB_STORAGE, and SATA) would just do a simple 
'select SCSI'. It would _not_ be hierarchical, and it would very much use 
that same old "select", but it would possibly be a cleanup at least in the 
sense that now CONFIG_SCSI wouldn't be used two different ways (one to 
hide most SCSI drivers, and one to enable the core SCSI infrastructure 
code).

> It would work quite nicely in the graphical tools, although you've
> thrown me a little by wanting it in the hacker's tool 'oldconfig' too.
> You obviously care more about turning stuff _on_ with 'make oldconfig'
> while other people who've spoken up seem to care more, as I do, about
> turning stuff _off_ that way. If I want my hand held, I'm happy enough
> to use the graphical tools.

I tend to just edit the .config file, and run "make oldconfig". And I know 
I'm not the only one, because I've talked to others who do the same.

And yes, then it's almost always correct to "turn things on as needed to 
make everything work out right", while turning things off would be 
actively wrong.

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-07  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-04 19:10 Super Kernel Sunday! Linus Torvalds
2007-02-04 19:40 ` Bauke Jan Douma
2007-02-04 21:00   ` Gene Heskett
2007-02-04 21:11   ` Kevin K
2007-02-04 19:56 ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-02-05  8:39 ` Jonathan Sambrook
2007-02-05  8:45 ` [patch] MTD: fix DOC2000/2001/2001PLUS build error Ingo Molnar
2007-02-05 13:06   ` Josh Boyer
2007-02-05 13:34   ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-05 15:56     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-05 16:08       ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-05 16:12       ` Russell King
2007-02-05 16:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-05 16:22       ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-05 16:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-05 16:31           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-05 16:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 17:05               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-05 17:08               ` Russell King
2007-02-05 21:15               ` Ingo Oeser
2007-02-06 13:32                 ` Gerhard Mack
2007-02-05 21:17               ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-05 21:28                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 21:39                   ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-05 21:49                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 21:53                       ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-05 22:21                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 22:31                           ` Randy Dunlap
2007-02-05 23:09                             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 23:21                               ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-05 23:32                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-06  0:04                                   ` Mark Rustad
2007-02-06 15:55                                     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-06 16:20                                       ` Mark Rustad
2007-02-06  9:45                                   ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-06 15:51                                     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-06 16:53                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-06 22:38                                       ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-06 22:39                                         ` Randy Dunlap
2007-02-06 23:11                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-06 23:15                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-06 23:18                                             ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-06 23:49                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-06 22:53                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-06 23:11                                           ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-06 23:28                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-06 23:36                                               ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-06 23:41                                                 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-02-06 23:49                                                   ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-06 23:52                                                   ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-02-06 23:55                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-07  0:03                                                   ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-07  0:21                                                     ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-02-07  0:30                                                       ` Randy Dunlap
2007-02-07  0:37                                                       ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-07  2:09                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-07 13:51                                                       ` Sunil Naidu
2007-02-06  1:09                                 ` Theodore Tso
2007-02-06  6:09                                   ` Matt Mackall
2007-02-06 16:04                                     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-06 16:41                                       ` Matt Mackall
2007-02-06 18:03                                         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-06  0:00                               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-06 13:52                               ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-06 15:16                               ` Mark Lord
2007-02-08  8:18                                 ` David Lang
2007-02-08  9:44                                 ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-06 15:41                           ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-05 22:21                       ` Alan
2007-02-05 22:35                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 21:50                 ` Alan
2007-02-05 21:41                   ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-06  5:46                 ` Matt Mackall
2007-02-06 15:34                   ` Paul Mundt
2007-02-06 22:39                   ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-06 22:51                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 16:33           ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-05 16:46           ` Russell King
2007-02-05 16:52             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-05 17:04               ` Russell King
2007-02-05 16:32     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 16:50       ` Russell King
2007-02-05 16:52       ` David Woodhouse
2007-02-05 17:58 ` Super Kernel Sunday! Jan Engelhardt
2007-02-05 18:07   ` Kevin Fox
2007-02-06 19:02   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-05 21:27 ` [2.6.20] Regression in dmfe driver Thomas Bächler
2007-02-06  9:38   ` Thierry Vignaud
2007-02-06 22:40     ` Thomas Bächler
2007-02-27 13:58 ` [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S Philipp Matthias Hahn
2007-03-05  4:10   ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-05 10:38     ` Philipp Matthias Hahn
2007-03-05 15:46       ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-06  9:23         ` Philipp Matthias Hahn
2007-03-09 12:50           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0702061615480.8424@woody.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --subject='Re: [patch] MTD: fix DOC2000/2001/2001PLUS build error' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).