LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 1/2] i386: add ptep_test_and_clear_{dirty,young}
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:27:07 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703260721490.18961@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4607713F.6010900@vmware.com>
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
> If you actually clear the bit, you need to:
>
> + pte_update_defer(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
>
> The reason is, when updating PTEs, the hypervisor must be notified. Using
> atomic operations to do this is fine for all hypervisors I am aware of.
> However, for hypervisors which shadow page tables, if these PTE modifications
> are not trapped, you need a post-modification call to fulfill the update of
> the shadow page table.
Thanks for the very rapid response.
So, David just needs to move the pte_update_defer out of
ptep_clear_flush_* and into ptep_test_and_clear_*?
That leaves me wondering why you deleted ptep_test_and_clear_*
(while leaving their __HAVE_ARCHes) in the first place?
Hugh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-26 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-26 0:35 [patch -mm 1/2] i386: add ptep_test_and_clear_{dirty,young} David Rientjes
2007-03-26 0:35 ` [patch -mm 2/2] smaps: use ptep_test_and_clear_young David Rientjes
2007-03-26 5:53 ` [patch -mm 1/2] i386: add ptep_test_and_clear_{dirty,young} Hugh Dickins
2007-03-26 7:07 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-26 6:27 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2007-03-26 20:20 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-26 6:35 ` David Rientjes
2007-03-26 20:22 ` Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0703260721490.18961@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).