LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>,
	andrea@suse.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fs/block_dev.c:953: warning: 'found' might be used uninitialized in this function
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:23:32 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703281909240.29565@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75b66ecd0703280956i522cf6cbyc4c9ef8b1666ec15@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Lee Revell wrote:

> > I compiled current git source 2.6.21-rc5-g28defbe and got this warning:
> > ...
> > fs/block_dev.c: In function `bd_claim_by_kobject':
> > fs/block_dev.c:953: warning: 'found' might be used uninitialized in this
> > function
> > ...
> Most of these warnings are really GCC bugs.  Please examine the code
> in question.

Anyway imho this time gcc got it right?



From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

blockdev: bd_claim_by_kobject() could check value of unititalized pointer

Fixes this warning:

fs/block_dev.c: In function `bd_claim_by_kobject':
fs/block_dev.c:953: warning: 'found' might be used uninitialized in this function

struct bd_holder *found is initialized only when bd_claim() returns zero. If it
returns nonzero, ptr stays uninitialized. Later the value of the pointer is checked.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

diff --git a/drivers/usb/input/hid-tmff.c b/drivers/usb/input/hid-tmff.c
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 575076c..e87d84a 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ static int bd_claim_by_kobject(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder,
 				struct kobject *kobj)
 {
 	int res;
-	struct bd_holder *bo, *found;
+	struct bd_holder *bo, *found = NULL;
 
 	if (!kobj)
 		return -EINVAL;

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-28 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-28 16:47 Toralf Förster
2007-03-28 16:56 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-28 17:23   ` Jiri Kosina [this message]
2007-03-28 20:14     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-28 21:59       ` Dan Aloni
2007-03-30  3:16       ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-30 19:47         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-31  3:09           ` Cong WANG
2007-03-31  8:11           ` Toralf Förster
2007-03-31 14:04             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-30 19:40   ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0703281909240.29565@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=jikos@jikos.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: fs/block_dev.c:953: warning: '\''found'\'' might be used uninitialized in this function' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).