LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:34:48 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705032033560.16788@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070503202111.667c9b14.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2007 20:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > Performance tests show a slight improvements in netperf (not a
> > strong case for a performance improvement but removing the
> > constructor has definitely no negative impact so why keep
> > this around?).
> >
> > TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
> > Recv Send Send
> > Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> > Size Size Size Time Throughput
> > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
> >
> > Before:
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6026.04
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 5992.17
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6071.23
> >
> > After:
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6090.20
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6078.3
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.00 6013.52
>
> How could a filesystem change affect networking performance?
>
> The change looks nice, but I'd microbenchmark it with a write-to-ext2-on-ramdisk
> or something like that.
Hmmmm.. I was told in another thread that this is the most frequently used
slab for this benchmark ...... Just accepted that as true.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-04 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-04 3:08 Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 3:34 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-05-04 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 4:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 6:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-04 16:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 23:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-04 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-05 9:31 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-13 20:38 ` oprofile broken in 2.6.21 SMP (was Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head) Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-15 3:12 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 21:42 ` Remove constructor from buffer_head Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 21:52 ` Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705032033560.16788@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).