LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:34:48 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705032033560.16788@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070503202111.667c9b14.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 3 May 2007 20:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> 
> > Performance tests show a slight improvements in netperf (not a
> > strong case for a performance improvement but removing the
> > constructor has definitely no negative impact so why keep
> > this around?).
> > 
> > TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
> > Recv   Send    Send
> > Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
> > Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
> > bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
> > 
> > Before:
> >  87380  16384  16384    10.01    6026.04
> >  87380  16384  16384    10.01    5992.17
> >  87380  16384  16384    10.01    6071.23
> > 
> > After:
> >  87380  16384  16384    10.01    6090.20
> >  87380  16384  16384    10.01    6078.3
> >  87380  16384  16384    10.00    6013.52
> 
> How could a filesystem change affect networking performance?
> 
> The change looks nice, but I'd microbenchmark it with a write-to-ext2-on-ramdisk
> or something like that.

Hmmmm.. I was told in another thread that this is the most frequently used 
slab for this benchmark ...... Just accepted that as true.
 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-04  3:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-04  3:08 Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04  3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04  3:34   ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-05-04  4:37     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04  4:34   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04  6:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-04 16:05   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 21:33   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 23:22     ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-04 23:45       ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-05  9:31         ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-13 20:38           ` oprofile broken in 2.6.21 SMP (was Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head) Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-15  3:12             ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 21:42   ` Remove constructor from buffer_head Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 21:47     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 21:52   ` Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705032033560.16788@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).