From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767601AbXEDGN0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 02:13:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754589AbXEDGNZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 02:13:25 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:37519 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754535AbXEDGNY (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 02:13:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:13:22 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka J Enberg To: Andrew Morton cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] revoke: change revoke_table to fileset and revoke_details In-Reply-To: <20070503170447.8520da9c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20070503132253.7b6fe5fe.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070503170447.8520da9c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > Well that's the "locking" protocol then: each instance of this structure is > only ever touched by a single thread, yes? Yes. Each do_revoke() call creates a new instance.