LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: accurate user accounting
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:07:50 +0400 (MSD) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706151002530.2175@linmac.oyster.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46720B19.5000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
> malc wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
[..snip..]
>>
>> Now integral load matches the one obtained via the "accurate" method.
>> However the report for individual cores are of by around 20% percent.
>>
>
> I think I missed some of the context, is the accounting of individual tasks
> or cpustat values off by 20%? I'll try and reproduce this problem.
Neither actually, the individual core idle times reported via `/proc/stat'
are off by 20 percent, one over estimates and the other under estimates
and the sum is right on the mark.
>
> Could you provide more details on the APC tool that you are using -- I
> do not understand the orange and yellow lines, do they represent system
> and user time?
It's somewhat documented on the page: http://www.boblycat.org/~malc/apc
Anyway the left bar is based on information from `/proc/stat' the right
one is derived from the kernel module that just times how much time was
spent in idle handler. The graphs: red - `/proc/stat', yellow - module.
> NOTE: There is some inconsistency in the values reported by /usr/bin/time
> (getrusage) and values reported in /proc or through delay accounting.
I don't really use `getrusage'.
--
vale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-15 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-25 1:59 [PATCH] [RFC] " Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 2:14 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 7:51 ` [patch] " Ingo Molnar
2007-03-25 8:39 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-25 11:34 ` malc
2007-03-25 11:46 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 12:02 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 12:32 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-25 12:41 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 13:33 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-25 13:05 ` malc
2007-03-25 13:06 ` malc
2007-03-25 14:15 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 14:57 ` malc
2007-03-25 15:08 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 15:19 ` malc
2007-03-25 15:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 17:14 ` malc
2007-03-25 23:01 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 23:57 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-26 10:49 ` malc
2007-03-28 11:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-14 17:56 ` Vassili Karpov
2007-06-14 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-14 20:56 ` malc
2007-06-14 21:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-14 21:37 ` malc
2007-06-15 3:44 ` Balbir Singh
2007-06-15 6:07 ` malc [this message]
2007-06-16 13:21 ` Balbir Singh
2007-06-16 14:07 ` malc
2007-06-16 18:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-16 20:31 ` malc
2007-03-26 5:11 Al Boldi
2007-03-26 5:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-26 8:45 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0706151002530.2175@linmac.oyster.ru \
--to=av1474@comtv.ru \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--subject='Re: [patch] sched: accurate user accounting' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).