LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: accurate user accounting
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:07:50 +0400 (MSD)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706151002530.2175@linmac.oyster.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46720B19.5000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:

> malc wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>

[..snip..]

>>
>> Now integral load matches the one obtained via the "accurate" method.
>> However the report for individual cores are of by around 20% percent.
>>
>
> I think I missed some of the context, is the accounting of individual tasks
> or cpustat values off by 20%? I'll try and reproduce this problem.

Neither actually, the individual core idle times reported via `/proc/stat'
are off by 20 percent, one over estimates and the other under estimates
and the sum is right on the mark.

>
> Could you provide more details on the APC tool that you are using -- I
> do not understand the orange and yellow lines, do they represent system
> and user time?

It's somewhat documented on the page: http://www.boblycat.org/~malc/apc
Anyway the left bar is based on information from `/proc/stat' the right
one is derived from the kernel module that just times how much time was
spent in idle handler. The graphs: red - `/proc/stat', yellow - module.

> NOTE: There is some inconsistency in the values reported by /usr/bin/time
> (getrusage) and values reported in /proc or through delay accounting.

I don't really use `getrusage'.

-- 
vale

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-15  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-25  1:59 [PATCH] [RFC] " Con Kolivas
2007-03-25  2:14 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25  7:51 ` [patch] " Ingo Molnar
2007-03-25  8:39   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25  9:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-25 11:34   ` malc
2007-03-25 11:46     ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 12:02       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 12:32         ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-25 12:41           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 13:33             ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-25 13:05         ` malc
2007-03-25 13:06         ` malc
2007-03-25 14:15           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 14:57             ` malc
2007-03-25 15:08               ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 15:19                 ` malc
2007-03-25 15:28                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 17:14                     ` malc
2007-03-25 23:01                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-25 23:57                         ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-26 10:49                           ` malc
2007-03-28 11:37                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-14 17:56                               ` Vassili Karpov
2007-06-14 20:42                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-14 20:56                                   ` malc
2007-06-14 21:18                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-14 21:37                                       ` malc
2007-06-15  3:44                                         ` Balbir Singh
2007-06-15  6:07                                           ` malc [this message]
2007-06-16 13:21                                             ` Balbir Singh
2007-06-16 14:07                                               ` malc
2007-06-16 18:40                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-16 20:31                                                   ` malc
2007-03-26  5:11 Al Boldi
2007-03-26  5:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-26  8:45 ` Con Kolivas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0706151002530.2175@linmac.oyster.ru \
    --to=av1474@comtv.ru \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --subject='Re: [patch] sched: accurate user accounting' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).