LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Marc Lehmann <linux-kernel@tst.eu>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:59:07 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710270950170.12127@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071027085125.GC12326@schmorp.de>
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > Please provide some code to illustrate one exact problem you have.
>
> // assume there is an open epoll set that listens for events on fd 5
> if (fork () = 0)
> {
> close (5);
> // fd 5 is now removed from the epoll set of the parent.
> _exit (0);
> }
Hmmm ... what? I assume you know that:
1) A file descriptor is a userspace view/handle of a kernel object
2) The kernel object has a use-count for as many file descriptors that
have been handed out to userspace
3) A close() decreases the internal counter by one
4) The kernel object gets effectively closed when the internal counter
goes to zero
5) A fork() acts as a dup() on the file descriptors by hence bumping up
its internal counter
6) Epoll removes the file from the set, when the *kernel* object gets
closed (internal use-count goes to zero)
With that in mind, how can the code snippet above trigger a removal from
the epoll set?
- Davide
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-27 6:22 Marc Lehmann
2007-10-27 8:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-27 8:51 ` Marc Lehmann
2007-10-27 9:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-27 9:34 ` Marc Lehmann
2007-10-27 10:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-27 10:46 ` Marc Lehmann
2007-10-27 16:59 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2007-10-27 17:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-10-27 18:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-29 22:36 ` Mark Lord
2007-10-28 4:47 ` David Schwartz
2007-10-28 9:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-10-28 21:04 ` David Schwartz
2007-10-29 18:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-26 15:13 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-02-26 18:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-27 1:30 ` Chris "ク" Heath
2008-02-27 19:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-28 13:12 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-02-28 13:23 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-02-28 19:34 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-28 19:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-29 15:46 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-02-29 19:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-02-29 19:54 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-02 15:11 ` Sam Varshavchik
2008-03-02 21:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-28 18:48 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0710270950170.12127@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com \
--to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@tst.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).