LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
To: "Peters, Gordon" <gordon.peters@intel.com>
Cc: "Gosney, JeremiX" <jeremix.gosney@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Sy, Dely L" <dely.l.sy@intel.com>
Subject: RE: ARP Bug?
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:30:05 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712191929430.12329@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A64AD58EE71B34FB333E733C62CDE3C04A83F60@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>


On Dec 19 2007 09:47, Peters, Gordon wrote:

>Call me crazy,

For top-posting, yes. :)

> but if I have 2 NICs in a system and all the traffic is
>going through one of them and then that one NIC cable gets pulled, the
>other NIC, that half of the traffic should have been going through in
>the first place, should still work. However, with this type of
>functionality, it does not. Effectively both NICs are now dead even
>though the cable has only been pulled from eth0. Once you pull the cable
>to that "primary" NIC, all traffic stops; even when the "secondary" NIC
>is up and working fine. That in my professional opinion is broken.

I think you should finally reveal your interface configuration
otherwise it's all smoke and mirrors.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-19 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-15  1:11 Gosney, JeremiX
2007-12-15  1:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
     [not found]   ` <3A64AD58EE71B34FB333E733C62CDE3C04A83F60@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
2007-12-19 18:30     ` Jan Engelhardt [this message]
2007-12-19 20:51 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-01-30 12:29 Matti Linnanvuori
2008-01-30 12:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-30 12:44 Matti Linnanvuori
2008-01-30 13:20 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-30 13:28   ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-30 13:23 ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0712191929430.12329@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr \
    --to=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=dely.l.sy@intel.com \
    --cc=gordon.peters@intel.com \
    --cc=jeremix.gosney@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='RE: ARP Bug?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).