LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ide: generic packet command representation
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:04:48 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802151503580.30301@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802120109.24152.bzolnier@gmail.com>


On Feb 12 2008 01:09, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
>> On a different note, i noticed ide-scsi might also need a cleanup
>> similar to the other drivers. It is next on my TODO list in case
>> you don't have anything with a higher prio.
>
>I was actually hoping that you'll continue unifying ATAPI handling...
>
>[ ide-scsi is orphaned and has (probably) unfixable problems
>  (because of having dependencies on both IDE and SCSI subsystems)
>  so it is not worth IMO but I will of course accept patches... ]

So, why is ide-scsi still in the tree? Is there some use case besides
cdrecord? (Which can use /dev/hda already without the ide-scsi blob...)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-15 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-11  8:34 Borislav Petkov
2008-02-11  8:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] ide: add generic packet command representation ide_atapi_pc Borislav Petkov
2008-02-11  8:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] ide-floppy: convert driver to using generic ide_atapi_pc Borislav Petkov
2008-02-11  8:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] ide-tape: " Borislav Petkov
2008-02-11  8:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] ide-scsi: " Borislav Petkov
2008-02-12  0:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] ide: generic packet command representation Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-12  5:59   ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]     ` <200802121328.48515.bzolnier@gmail.com>
2008-02-12 15:25       ` [PATCH] ide-scsi: do non-atomic pc->flags testing Borislav Petkov
2008-02-12 20:17         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-15 14:04   ` Jan Engelhardt [this message]
2008-02-15 14:24     ` [PATCH 0/4] ide: generic packet command representation Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0802151503580.30301@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr \
    --to=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petkovbb@gmail.com \
    --cc=petkovbb@googlemail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/4] ide: generic packet command representation' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).