LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Fix Unlikely(x) == y
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:01:35 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802181500410.13406@vixen.sonytel.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080218135609.GD21080@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2637 bytes --]
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:50:03PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 10:39 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >...
> > > for mordern (last 10 years) x86 cpus... the cpu branchpredictor is better
> > > than the coder in general. Same for most other architectures.
> > >
> > > unlikely() creates bigger code as well.
> > >
> > > Now... we're talking about your super duper hotpath function here right?
> > > One where you care about 0.5 cycle speed improvement? (less on modern
> > > systems ;)
> >
> > The first patch was to platforms/ps3 code, which runs on the Cell, in
> > particular the PPE ... which is not an x86 :)
> >
> > eg:
> >
> > [michael@schoenaich ~]$ cat branch.c
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > int main(void)
> > {
> > int i, j;
> >
> > for (i = 0, j = 0; i < 1000000000; i++)
> > if (i % 4 == 0)
> > j++;
> >
> > printf("j = %d\n", j);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > [michael@schoenaich ~]$ ppu-gcc -Wall -O3 -o branch branch.c
> > [michael@schoenaich ~]$ time ./branch
> > real 0m5.172s
> >
> > [michael@schoenaich ~]$ cat branch.c
> > ..
> > for (i = 0, j = 0; i < 1000000000; i++)
> > if (__builtin_expect(i % 4 == 0, 0))
> > j++;
> > ..
> > [michael@schoenaich ~]$ ppu-gcc -Wall -O3 -o branch branch.c
> > [michael@schoenaich ~]$ time ./branch
> > real 0m3.762s
> >
> >
> > Which looks as though unlikely() is helping. Admittedly we don't have a
> > lot of kernel code that looks like that, but at least unlikely is doing
> > what we want it to.
>
> This means it generates faster code with a current gcc for your platform.
>
> But a future gcc might e.g. replace the whole loop with a division
> (gcc SVN head (that will soon become gcc 4.3) already does
> transformations like replacing loops with divisions [1]).
Hence shouldn't we ask the gcc people what's the purpose of __builtin_expect(),
if it doesn't live up to its promise?
With kind regards,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Software Architect
Sony Network and Software Technology Center Europe
The Corporate Village · Da Vincilaan 7-D1 · B-1935 Zaventem · Belgium
Phone: +32 (0)2 700 8453
Fax: +32 (0)2 700 8622
E-mail: Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com
Internet: http://www.sony-europe.com/
Sony Network and Software Technology Center Europe
A division of Sony Service Centre (Europe) N.V.
Registered office: Technologielaan 7 · B-1840 Londerzeel · Belgium
VAT BE 0413.825.160 · RPR Brussels
Fortis Bank Zaventem · Swift GEBABEBB08A · IBAN BE39001382358619
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-18 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-16 16:08 Roel Kluin
2008-02-16 17:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-16 17:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-16 17:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-16 17:58 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-16 18:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-17 9:45 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Andrew Pinski
2008-02-17 10:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-16 18:31 ` Geoff Levand
2008-02-16 18:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-17 11:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-02-18 13:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-18 14:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2008-02-18 14:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-18 21:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-02-19 7:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-18 19:22 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Andrew Pinski
2008-02-18 14:27 ` David Howells
2008-02-18 14:59 ` Roel Kluin
2008-02-18 18:11 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-02-18 18:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 14:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-19 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 2:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-19 4:41 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 5:58 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-19 6:20 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 9:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-20 7:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-19 9:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-19 9:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 9:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-19 22:25 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-16 18:41 ` Geoff Levand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0802181500410.13406@vixen.sonytel.be \
--to=geert.uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=12o3l@tiscali.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/3] Fix Unlikely(x) == y' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).