LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] fix missed SIGCONT cases
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:42:07 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802281238550.3391@jikos.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080228102649.071572700FD@magilla.localdomain>
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Roland McGrath wrote:
> [PATCH] clean up and fix SIGCONT
> This reorganizes some of the signals code, replacing handle_stop_signal()
> with prepare_signal() and finish_signal(), called as a pair before and
> after generating any signal. The CLD_CONTINUED notification to parent is
> moved into finish_signal(), taking place after the signal is made pending
> and siglock dropped. This fixes a race where a process waking from SIGCONT
> could resume application code without running its SIGCONT handler first.
Hi Roland,
I haven't tested what is the behavior with my patch, or without any
patches at all (will do), but with your patch applied, when I run the test
program under strace, it resumes immediately ... doesn't look particularly
OK to me:
$ strace -o /dev/null ./a.out | head -10
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
finished (without SIGCONT)
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-28 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-27 15:22 Jiri Kosina
2008-02-27 21:00 ` Roland McGrath
2008-02-27 22:04 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-28 10:26 ` Roland McGrath
2008-02-28 11:42 ` Jiri Kosina [this message]
2008-02-28 15:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-02-28 15:32 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-28 15:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-02-28 15:40 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-28 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-02-28 16:13 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-28 16:45 ` [PATCH] handle_stop_signal: don't wake up the stopped task until it sees SIGCONT Oleg Nesterov
2008-02-28 16:56 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-29 2:39 ` [PATCH] [RFC] fix missed SIGCONT cases Roland McGrath
2008-02-29 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-02-29 13:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-01 1:59 ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-01 16:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-03 13:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-06 10:50 ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-06 9:05 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0802281238550.3391@jikos.suse.cz \
--to=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] [RFC] fix missed SIGCONT cases' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).