LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wan, Jane (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale)" <jane.wan@nokia.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Cc: "miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
	"marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	"yamada.masahiro@socionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	"prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com" <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"jagdish.gediya@nxp.com" <jagdish.gediya@nxp.com>,
	"shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com" <shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Bos, Ties (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale)" <ties.bos@nokia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6] mtd: rawnand: use bit-wise majority to recover the contents of ONFI parameter
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 04:39:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR07MB1615A4F4FAF56D8064F173AA819D0@VI1PR07MB1615.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180512102040.3e5c2cbe@bbrezillon>

Hi Boris,

I've sent v7 of the patch.

Thanks.
Jane

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@bootlin.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 1:21 AM
> To: Wan, Jane (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) <jane.wan@nokia.com>
> Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com; dwmw2@infradead.org;
> computersforpeace@gmail.com; richard@nod.at; marek.vasut@gmail.com;
> yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com;
> shawnguo@kernel.org; jagdish.gediya@nxp.com;
> shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Bos, Ties (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) <ties.bos@nokia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mtd: rawnand: use bit-wise majority to recover the
> contents of ONFI parameter
> 
> On Thu, 10 May 2018 14:28:37 -0700
> Jane Wan <Jane.Wan@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> > Per ONFI specification (Rev. 4.0), if all parameter pages have invalid
> > CRC values, the bit-wise majority may be used to recover the contents
> > of the parameter pages from the parameter page copies present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jane Wan <Jane.Wan@nokia.com>
> > ---
> > v6: support the cases that srcbufs are not contiguous
> > v5: make the bit-wise majority functon generic
> > v4: move the bit-wise majority code in a separate function
> > v3: fix warning message detected by kbuild test robot
> > v2: rebase the changes on top of v4.17-rc1
> >
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c |   52
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > index 72f3a89..acf905c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > @@ -5087,6 +5087,35 @@ static int
> > nand_flash_detect_ext_param_page(struct nand_chip *chip,  }
> >
> >  /*
> > + * Recover data with bit-wise majority  */ static void
> > +nand_bit_wise_majority(const void **srcbufs,
> > +				   unsigned int nsrcbufs,
> > +				   void *dstbuf,
> > +				   unsigned int bufsize)
> > +{
> > +	int i, j, k;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < bufsize; i++) {
> > +		u8 cnt, val;
> > +
> > +		val = 0;
> > +		for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
> > +			cnt = 0;
> > +			for (k = 0; k < nsrcbufs; k++) {
> > +				const u8 *srcbuf = srcbufs[k];
> > +
> > +				if (srcbuf[i] & BIT(j))
> > +					cnt++;
> > +			}
> > +			if (cnt > nsrcbufs / 2)
> > +				val |= BIT(j);
> > +		}
> > +		((u8 *)dstbuf)[i] = val;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> >   * Check if the NAND chip is ONFI compliant, returns 1 if it is, 0 otherwise.
> >   */
> >  static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct nand_chip *chip) @@ -5102,7
> > +5131,7 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct nand_chip *chip)
> >  		return 0;
> >
> >  	/* ONFI chip: allocate a buffer to hold its parameter page */
> > -	p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	p = kzalloc((sizeof(*p) * 3), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!p)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > @@ -5113,21 +5142,34 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct
> nand_chip *chip)
> >  	}
> >
> >  	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > -		ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, sizeof(*p), true);
> > +		ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, &p[i], sizeof(*p), true);
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			ret = 0;
> >  			goto free_onfi_param_page;
> >  		}
> >
> > -		if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (uint8_t *)p, 254) ==
> > +		if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)&p[i], 254) ==
> >  				le16_to_cpu(p->crc)) {
> > +			if (i)
> > +				memcpy(p, &p[i], sizeof(*p));
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (i == 3) {
> > -		pr_err("Could not find valid ONFI parameter page; aborting\n");
> > -		goto free_onfi_param_page;
> > +		const void *srcbufs[3] = {p, p + 1, p + 2};
> > +
> > +		pr_err("Could not find valid ONFI parameter page\n");
> 
> Maybe pr_warn() here
> 
> > +		pr_info("Recover ONFI params with bit-wise majority\n");
> 
> and maybe you can pack the 2 messages:
> 
> 		pr_warn("Could not find a valid ONFI parameter page, trying
> bit-wise majority to recover it");

[Jane] Changed as suggested.

> 
> > +
> > +		nand_bit_wise_majority(srcbufs, ARRAY_SIZE(srcbufs), p,
> > +				       sizeof(*p));
> > +
> > +		if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)p, 254) !=
> > +				le16_to_cpu(p->crc)) {
> > +			pr_err("ONFI parameter recovery failed, aborting\n");
> > +			goto free_onfi_param_page;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >
> >  	/* Check version */

      reply	other threads:[~2018-05-13  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-10 21:28 Jane Wan
2018-05-12  8:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-05-13  4:39   ` Wan, Jane (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VI1PR07MB1615A4F4FAF56D8064F173AA819D0@VI1PR07MB1615.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=jane.wan@nokia.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jagdish.gediya@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com \
    --cc=ties.bos@nokia.com \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --subject='RE: [PATCH v6] mtd: rawnand: use bit-wise majority to recover the contents of ONFI parameter' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).