LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: brookxu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-throtl: optimize IOPS throttle for large IO scenarios
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 06:21:11 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQAydzEhZfPUpzWI@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34a6f4b5-9055-e519-5693-068f8dcb169c@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:06:18AM +0800, brookxu wrote:
> Make blk-throttle use rq-qos may be more elegant. But I found that there may be at least
> one problem that is difficult to solve. blk-throttle supports separate throttle for read
> and write IOs, which means that we cannot suspend tasks during throttle, but rq-qos
> throttle IOs by suspending tasks.
Ah, right, I forgot about that.
> We may be able to relocate the blk-throttle hooks to the rq-qos hooks. Since we may not
> be able to replace the throttle hook, in this case, if we register a rq-qos to the system,
> part of the blk-throttle hooks is in rq-qos and part hooks not, which feels a bit confusing.
> In addition, we may need to implement more hooks, such as IO merge hook.
Would it be possible to just move the blk-throtl throttling hook right next
to the rq-qos hook so that it gets throttled after splitting?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-16 6:22 brookxu
2021-07-16 16:09 ` Tejun Heo
2021-07-16 23:07 ` brookxu
2021-07-19 16:35 ` brookxu
2021-07-26 21:46 ` Tejun Heo
2021-07-27 3:06 ` brookxu
2021-07-27 16:21 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2021-07-28 2:33 ` brookxu
2021-07-28 7:48 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQAydzEhZfPUpzWI@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] blk-throtl: optimize IOPS throttle for large IO scenarios' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).