LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 58/63] futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:56:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQfraWyUYKtWgsQF@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210730135208.418508738@linutronix.de>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 03:51:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +static inline bool futex_requeue_pi_prepare(struct futex_q *q,
> + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
> +{
> + int cur, res, new;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set state to Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS unless an early wakeup has
> + * already set Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE to signal that requeue should
> + * ignore the waiter.
> + */
> + for (cur = atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);; cur = res) {
> + if (cur == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() might have set it to
> + * IN_PROGRESS and a interleaved early wake to WAIT.
> + *
> + * It was considered to have an extra state for that
> + * trylock, but that would just add more conditionals
> + * all over the place for a dubious value.
> + */
> + if (cur != Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE)
> + break;
> +
> + new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS;
> + res = atomic_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, cur, new);
> + if (likely(cur == res))
> + break;
> + }
> + q->pi_state = pi_state;
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void futex_requeue_pi_complete(struct futex_q *q, int locked)
> +{
> + int cur, res, new;
> +
> + for (cur = atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);; cur = res) {
> + if (locked >= 0) {
> + /* Requeue succeeded. Set DONE or LOCKED */
> + new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE + locked;
> + } else if (cur == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
> + /* Deadlock, no early wakeup interleave */
> + new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE;
> + } else {
> + /* Deadlock, early wakeup interleave. */
> + new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
> + }
> +
> + res = atomic_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, cur, new);
> + if (likely(cur == res))
> + break;
> + }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + /* If the waiter interleaved with the requeue let it know */
> + if (unlikely(cur == Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT))
> + rcuwait_wake_up(&q->requeue_wait);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static inline int futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(struct futex_q *q)
> +{
> + int cur, new, res;
> +
> + for (cur = atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);; cur = res) {
> + /* Is requeue done already? */
> + if (cur >= Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE)
> + break;
> +
> + /*
> + * If not done, then tell the requeue code to either ignore
> + * the waiter or to wake it up once the requeue is done.
> + */
> + new = !cur ? Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE : Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT;
> + res = atomic_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, cur, new);
> + if (likely(cur == res))
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* If the requeue was in progress, wait for it to complete */
> + if (cur == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + rcuwait_wait_event(&q->requeue_wait,
> + atomic_read(&q->requeue_state) != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT,
> + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +#else
> + while (atomic_read(&q->requeue_state) == Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT)
> + cpu_relax();
> +#endif
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Requeue is now either prohibited or complete. Reread state
> + * because during the wait above it might have changed. Nothing
> + * will modify q->requeue_state after this point.
> + */
> + return atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);
> +}
I did:
- atomic_cmpxchg() -> atomic_try_cmpxchg()
- atomic_read() -> atomic_read_acquire(); which I think is required for
at least the futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync() >= Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE case
to ensure we observe the state as per whoever set DONE/LOCKED.
- use atomic_cond_read_relaxed()
- removed one ternary operator for (IMO) clearer code.
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1853,15 +1853,16 @@ enum {
static inline bool futex_requeue_pi_prepare(struct futex_q *q,
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
{
- int cur, res, new;
+ int old, new;
/*
* Set state to Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS unless an early wakeup has
* already set Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE to signal that requeue should
* ignore the waiter.
*/
- for (cur = atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);; cur = res) {
- if (cur == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE)
+ old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
+ do {
+ if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE)
return false;
/*
@@ -1872,74 +1873,68 @@ static inline bool futex_requeue_pi_prep
* trylock, but that would just add more conditionals
* all over the place for a dubious value.
*/
- if (cur != Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE)
+ if (old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE)
break;
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS;
- res = atomic_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, cur, new);
- if (likely(cur == res))
- break;
- }
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
+
q->pi_state = pi_state;
return true;
}
static inline void futex_requeue_pi_complete(struct futex_q *q, int locked)
{
- int cur, res, new;
+ int old, new;
- for (cur = atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);; cur = res) {
+ old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
+ do {
if (locked >= 0) {
/* Requeue succeeded. Set DONE or LOCKED */
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE + locked;
- } else if (cur == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
+ } else if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
/* Deadlock, no early wakeup interleave */
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE;
} else {
/* Deadlock, early wakeup interleave. */
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
}
-
- res = atomic_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, cur, new);
- if (likely(cur == res))
- break;
- }
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
/* If the waiter interleaved with the requeue let it know */
- if (unlikely(cur == Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT))
+ if (unlikely(old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT))
rcuwait_wake_up(&q->requeue_wait);
#endif
}
static inline int futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(struct futex_q *q)
{
- int cur, new, res;
+ int old, new;
- for (cur = atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);; cur = res) {
+ old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
+ do {
/* Is requeue done already? */
- if (cur >= Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE)
+ if (old >= Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE)
break;
/*
* If not done, then tell the requeue code to either ignore
* the waiter or to wake it up once the requeue is done.
*/
- new = !cur ? Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE : Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT;
- res = atomic_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, cur, new);
- if (likely(cur == res))
- break;
- }
+ new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT;
+ if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE)
+ new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
/* If the requeue was in progress, wait for it to complete */
- if (cur == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
+ if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
rcuwait_wait_event(&q->requeue_wait,
atomic_read(&q->requeue_state) != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
#else
- while (atomic_read(&q->requeue_state) == Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT)
- cpu_relax();
+ (void)atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&q->requeue_state, VAL != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
#endif
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-02 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-30 13:50 [patch 00/63] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 01/63] sched: Split out the wakeup state check Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 02/63] sched: Introduce TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 03/63] sched: Prepare for RT sleeping spin/rwlocks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-01 15:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-08-03 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-03 14:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-03 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-03 20:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 04/63] sched: Rework the __schedule() preempt argument Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 05/63] sched: Provide schedule point for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 06/63] sched/wake_q: Provide WAKE_Q_HEAD_INITIALIZER Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 07/63] media/atomisp: Use lockdep instead of *mutex_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 08/63] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 09/63] rtmutex: Convert macros to inlines Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 10/63] rtmutex: Switch to try_cmpxchg() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 11/63] rtmutex: Split API and implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 12/63] rtmutex: Split out the inner parts of struct rtmutex Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 13/63] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_slowlock_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 14/63] rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_base_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 15/63] locking: Add base code for RT rw_semaphore and rwlock Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-04 19:37 ` Waiman Long
2021-08-05 9:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-05 14:59 ` Waiman Long
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 16/63] locking/rwsem: Add rtmutex based R/W semaphore implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 17/63] locking/rtmutex: Add wake_state to rt_mutex_waiter Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 18/63] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_wake_q and helpers Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 19/63] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 20/63] locking/rtmutex: Prepare RT rt_mutex_wake_q for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 21/63] locking/rtmutex: Guard regular sleeping locks specific functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 22/63] locking/spinlock: Split the lock types header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-04 21:17 ` Waiman Long
2021-08-05 8:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 23/63] locking/rtmutex: Prevent future include recursion hell Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 24/63] locking/lockdep: Reduce includes in debug_locks.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 25/63] rbtree: Split out the rbtree type definitions Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 26/63] locking/rtmutex: Include only rbtree types Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 27/63] locking/spinlock: Provide RT specific spinlock type Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 28/63] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant header Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 29/63] locking/rtmutex: Provide the spin/rwlock core lock function Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 30/63] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-04 23:34 ` Waiman Long
2021-08-05 8:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 31/63] locking/rwlock: " Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 32/63] locking/mutex: Consolidate core headers Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 33/63] locking/mutex: Move waiter to core header Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 34/63] locking/ww_mutex: Move ww_mutex declarations into ww_mutex.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 35/63] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock raw Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 36/63] locking/ww_mutex: Simplify lockdep annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 37/63] locking/ww_mutex: Gather mutex_waiter initialization Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 38/63] locking/ww_mutex: Split up ww_mutex_unlock() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 39/63] locking/ww_mutex: Split W/W implementation logic Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 40/63] locking/ww_mutex: Remove __sched annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 41/63] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract waiter iteration Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 42/63] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract waiter enqueueing Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 43/63] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 44/63] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex types Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 45/63] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract internal lock access Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 46/63] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rt_mutex accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 47/63] locking/ww_mutex: Add RT priority to W/W order Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 48/63] locking/ww_mutex: Add rt_mutex based lock type and accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 49/63] locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 50/63] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based ww_mutex API functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-31 13:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-08-01 21:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 51/63] locking/rtmutex: Add mutex variant for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:50 ` [patch 52/63] lib/test_lockup: Adapt to changed variables Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 53/63] futex: Validate waiter correctly in futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 54/63] futex: Cleanup stale comments Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 55/63] futex: Correct the number of requeued waiters for PI Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 56/63] futex: Restructure futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 57/63] futex: Clarify comment in futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 58/63] futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-02 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-08-02 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-02 14:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-02 14:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-03 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-03 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-03 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-03 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-03 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-03 21:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 59/63] rtmutex: Prevent lockdep false positive with PI futexes Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 60/63] preempt: Adjust PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 61/63] locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 62/63] locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-04 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-04 17:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-30 13:51 ` [patch 63/63] locking/rtmutex: Use adaptive spinwait for all rtmutex based locks Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <20210803063217.2325-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-08-03 9:10 ` [patch 30/63] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-03 12:37 ` [patch 00/63] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking infrastructure Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQfraWyUYKtWgsQF@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [patch 58/63] futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).