LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	"Dexuan Cui" <decui@microsoft.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Sunil Muthuswamy" <sunilmut@microsoft.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] PCI: hv: Support host bridge probing on ARM64
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 23:47:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YR59KJ+SenbQ58cw@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210819141758.GA27305@lpieralisi>

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 03:17:58PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 02:06:49AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is the v6 for the preparation of virtual PCI support on Hyper-V
> > ARM64, Previous versions:
> > 
> > v1:	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210319161956.2838291-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
> > v2:	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210503144635.2297386-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
> > v3:	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210609163211.3467449-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
> > v4:	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210714102737.198432-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
> > v5:	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210720134429.511541-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
> > 
> > Changes since last version:
> > 
> > *	Rebase to 5.14-rc3
> > 
> > *	Comment fixes as suggested by Bjorn.
> > 
> > The basic problem we need to resolve is that ARM64 is an arch with
> > PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=y, so the bus sysdata is pci_config_window. However,
> > Hyper-V PCI provides a paravirtualized PCI interface, so there is no
> > actual pci_config_window for a PCI host bridge, so no information can be
> > retrieve from the pci_config_window of a Hyper-V virtual PCI bus. Also
> > there is no corresponding ACPI device for the Hyper-V PCI root bridge,
> > which introduces a special case when trying to find the ACPI device from
> > the sysdata (see patch #3).
> > 
> > With this patchset, we could enable the virtual PCI on Hyper-V ARM64
> > guest with other code under development.
> > 
> > Comments and suggestions are welcome.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Boqun
> > 
> > Arnd Bergmann (1):
> >   PCI: hv: Generify PCI probing
> > 
> > Boqun Feng (7):
> >   PCI: Introduce domain_nr in pci_host_bridge
> >   PCI: Support populating MSI domains of root buses via bridges
> >   arm64: PCI: Restructure pcibios_root_bridge_prepare()
> >   arm64: PCI: Support root bridge preparation for Hyper-V
> >   PCI: hv: Set ->domain_nr of pci_host_bridge at probing time
> >   PCI: hv: Set up MSI domain at bridge probing time
> >   PCI: hv: Turn on the host bridge probing on ARM64
> > 
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c             | 29 +++++++---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++------------
> >  drivers/pci/probe.c                 | 12 +++-
> >  include/linux/pci.h                 | 11 ++++
> >  4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> 
> If we take this series via the PCI tree we'd need Catalin/Will ACKs on
> patches 3-4.
> 

Got it.

> I need some time to look into [1] (thanks for that).
> 
> Without [1] patch 8 is ugly, that's no news. The question is whether
> it is worth waiting for a kernel cycle to integrate [1] into this series
> or not.
> 
> Is it really a problem if we postpone this series for another kernel
> cycle so that we can look into it ?
> 

Well, it's definitely better for me that we can have it in 5.15-rc1 ;-),
because it's a dependency for Hyper-V virtual PCI support on ARM64 and
we plan to send the rest of work in 5.15 cycle. And I can just base on
hyperv-next for the rest of the work if this is in 5.15-rc1. But yes,
it's not really a problem, since this one still needs to work with other
patches to support virtual PCI on ARM64 Hyper-V.

In fact, I personally don't think [1] is better than patch 8 (plus patch
3 & 4): playing with ->private seems dangerous and not very helpful on
readiblity, but I agree that we should explore every potential solution,
and that's why I send [1].

Regards,
Boqun

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210811153619.88922-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-19 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 18:06 Boqun Feng
2021-07-26 18:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] PCI: Introduce domain_nr in pci_host_bridge Boqun Feng
2021-07-26 18:06 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] PCI: Support populating MSI domains of root buses via bridges Boqun Feng
2021-07-27 16:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-26 18:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] arm64: PCI: Restructure pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() Boqun Feng
2021-08-23  9:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-26 18:06 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] arm64: PCI: Support root bridge preparation for Hyper-V Boqun Feng
2021-08-19 16:13   ` Boqun Feng
2021-08-20 17:49     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-23  9:12       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-23  9:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-26 18:06 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] PCI: hv: Generify PCI probing Boqun Feng
2021-07-26 18:06 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] PCI: hv: Set ->domain_nr of pci_host_bridge at probing time Boqun Feng
2021-07-26 18:06 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] PCI: hv: Set up MSI domain at bridge " Boqun Feng
2021-07-26 18:06 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] PCI: hv: Turn on the host bridge probing on ARM64 Boqun Feng
2021-08-03 17:14   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-09 14:38     ` Boqun Feng
2021-08-09 15:53       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-19 12:19         ` Boqun Feng
2021-07-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] PCI: hv: Support " Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-02  8:13   ` Boqun Feng
2021-08-02  8:15 ` Boqun Feng
2021-08-02 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-19 14:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-19 15:47   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2021-08-23 10:10     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-23 12:49       ` Boqun Feng
2021-08-23 10:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YR59KJ+SenbQ58cw@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=sunilmut@microsoft.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] PCI: hv: Support host bridge probing on ARM64' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).