LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp: Add support for SM6115 UFS phy
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:18:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRCzi9tXsUVi5kHS@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86fcdc11-9f2c-0aa0-ebab-a26fa9ac2aca@gmail.com>
On 06-08-21, 19:09, Iskren Chernev wrote:
> On 8/6/21 3:57 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 05-08-21, 12:17, Iskren Chernev wrote:
> > why are these registers 660 specific and not V3 like we have for
> > other generations..? Quick looks with V3 regs tells me that seem
> > similar....
> >
>
> Well, I looked at them for a long time and the only thing that is similar
> are the first few QSERDES registers from COM_ATB_SEL1=0x000 to
> COM_BIAS_EN_CLKBUFLR_EN=0x034. Everything else is different. So I can re-use
Is the offset different? I thought all Vn registers across chips do have
same offsets..
> the V3 for the similar regs, but they are 10%, so I figured instead of combing
> through all of the sequences to save 10% of the constants and make it slightly
> less readable just use new constants.
>
> Let me know if I should reuse the 14 regs from V3.
reuse yes, but would like to understand more why offsets are different,
Can you point me to downstream code reference for this?
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-09 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 9:17 [PATCH v1 0/2] Add UFS PHY support for SM6115/4250 Iskren Chernev
2021-08-05 9:17 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: Add SM6115 UFS PHY bindings Iskren Chernev
2021-08-13 18:38 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-05 9:17 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp: Add support for SM6115 UFS phy Iskren Chernev
2021-08-06 12:57 ` Vinod Koul
2021-08-06 16:09 ` Iskren Chernev
2021-08-09 4:48 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2021-08-09 14:20 ` Iskren Chernev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRCzi9tXsUVi5kHS@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iskren.chernev@gmail.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mgautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp: Add support for SM6115 UFS phy' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).