LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, apopple@nvidia.com,
	shy828301@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: migrate: Move the page count validation to the proper place
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 11:34:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRjtquPEpsked951@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <644a666e1e177c57a39a4c37c6e2ca64052b9d7e.1629008158.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 02:23:03PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> We've got the expected count for anonymous page or file page by
> expected_page_refs() at the beginning of migrate_page_move_mapping(),
> thus we should move the page count validation a little forward to
> reduce duplicated code.
> 
> Moreover the i_pages lock is not used to guarantee the page refcount
> safety in migrate_page_move_mapping(), so we can move the getting page
> count out of the i_pages lock. Since now the migration page has
> established a migration pte under the page lock now, with the page
> refcount freezing validation, to ensure that the page references
> meet the migration requirement.

I remain unconvinced by this.  

Looking at folio_migrate_mapping() a little more deeply, I don't
understand why we first check folio_ref_count() and then attempt
to free the refcount.  Why not just try to freeze it directly?

ie instead of your patch, this:

+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -403,13 +403,8 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
        newzone = folio_zone(newfolio);

        xas_lock_irq(&xas);
-       if (folio_ref_count(folio) != expected_count ||
-           xas_load(&xas) != folio) {
-               xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
-               return -EAGAIN;
-       }
-
-       if (!folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count)) {
+       if (xas_load(&xas) != folio ||
+           !folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count)) {
                xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
                return -EAGAIN;
        }

And since we've got the lock on the page, how can somebody else be
removing it from the page cache?  I think that xas_load() can be
removed too.  So even more simply,

+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -403,12 +403,6 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
        newzone = folio_zone(newfolio);

        xas_lock_irq(&xas);
-       if (folio_ref_count(folio) != expected_count ||
-           xas_load(&xas) != folio) {
-               xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
-               return -EAGAIN;
-       }
-
        if (!folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count)) {
                xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
                return -EAGAIN;

but I'm not really set up to test page migration.  Does your test suite
test migrating file-backed pages?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-15 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-15  6:23 [PATCH v2 0/4] Some cleanup for page migration Baolin Wang
2021-08-15  6:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: migrate: Move the page count validation to the proper place Baolin Wang
2021-08-15 10:34   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-08-16 10:58     ` Baolin Wang
2021-08-15  6:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: migrate: Introduce a local variable to get the number of pages Baolin Wang
2021-08-15  6:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: migrate: Fix the incorrect function name in comments Baolin Wang
2021-08-15  6:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: migrate: Change to use bool type for 'page_was_mapped' Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YRjtquPEpsked951@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: migrate: Move the page count validation to the proper place' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).