LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me> To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, dgilbert@interlog.com, jeyu@kernel.org, lucas.demarchi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] common/scsi_debug: use the patient module remover Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:35:02 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YRkJ9rkFPyYUy8p5@desktop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210811154512.1813622-4-mcgrof@kernel.org> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:45:12AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > If you try to run tests such as generic/108 in a loop > you'll eventually see a failure, but the failure can > be a false positive and the test was just unable to remove > the scsi_debug module. > > We need to give some time for the refcnt to become 0. For > instance for the test generic/108 the refcnt lingers between > 2 and 1. It should be 0 when we're done but a bit of time > seems to be required. The chance of us trying to run rmmod > when the refcnt is 2 or 1 is low, about 1/30 times if you > run the test in a loop on linux-next today. > > Likewise, even when its 0 we just need a tiny breather before > we can remove the module (sleep 10 suffices) but this is > only required on older kernels. Otherwise removing the module > will just fail. > > Some of these races are documented on the korg#212337, and > Doug Gilbert has posted at least one patch attempt to try > to help with this [1]. The patch does not resolve all the > issues though, it helps though. > > [0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212337 > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210508230745.27923-1-dgilbert@interlog.com > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> > --- > common/scsi_debug | 6 ++++-- There're also some "modprobe -r" calls in common/module, should the be replaced with _patient_rmmod as well? > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/scsi_debug b/common/scsi_debug > index e7988469..3c9cd820 100644 > --- a/common/scsi_debug > +++ b/common/scsi_debug > @@ -4,11 +4,13 @@ > # > # Functions useful for tests on unique block devices > > +. common/module > + > _require_scsi_debug() > { > # make sure we have the module and it's not already used > modinfo scsi_debug 2>&1 > /dev/null || _notrun "scsi_debug module not found" > - lsmod | grep -wq scsi_debug && (rmmod scsi_debug || _notrun "scsi_debug module in use") > + lsmod | grep -wq scsi_debug && (_patient_rmmod scsi_debug || _notrun "scsi_debug module in use") I don't think we should use _patient_rmmod here, if we set timeout to forever and there's actually some other process using scsi_debug module, we'll loop forever here. And a failure to remove scsi_debug only results in _notrun, and won't cause false test failure. > # make sure it has the features we need > # logical/physical sectors plus unmap support all went in together > modinfo scsi_debug | grep -wq sector_size || _notrun "scsi_debug too old" > @@ -53,5 +55,5 @@ _put_scsi_debug_dev() > $UDEV_SETTLE_PROG > n=$((n-1)) > done I think the above while loop could be removed as well? Thanks, Eryu > - rmmod scsi_debug || _fail "Could not remove scsi_debug module" > + _patient_rmmod scsi_debug || _fail "Could not remove scsi_debug module" > } > -- > 2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-15 12:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-11 15:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] fstests: add patient module remover Luis Chamberlain 2021-08-11 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] fstests: use udevadm settle after pvremove Luis Chamberlain 2021-08-15 12:36 ` Eryu Guan 2021-08-11 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] common/module: add patient module rmmod support Luis Chamberlain 2021-08-15 12:29 ` Eryu Guan 2021-08-18 14:02 ` Luis Chamberlain 2021-08-19 2:26 ` Eryu Guan 2021-08-19 23:58 ` Luis Chamberlain 2021-08-11 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] common/scsi_debug: use the patient module remover Luis Chamberlain 2021-08-15 12:35 ` Eryu Guan [this message] 2021-08-20 0:33 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YRkJ9rkFPyYUy8p5@desktop \ --to=guan@eryu.me \ --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \ --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=hare@suse.de \ --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \ --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).