LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH] sched/fair: micro-optimize pick_next_entity()
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:09:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YS44IzVARx2ZaEUo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1629872869-19829-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 02:27:49PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> Only check the skip buddy when next buddy and last buddy
> are not picked up, this can save the cycles of checking
> the skip buddy and computation of the second buddy, when
> next and last buddy will be picked up
> for example, yield_to_task_fair() set both next and skip
> buddy
Is that actually measurable?
But looking at it, should we not, instead, move the whole ->skip thing to
the bottom, so we unconditionally check it vs the result of
->next/->last ?
Imagine ->next == ->skip, then we want to avoid running it and not have
->next win.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-31 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-25 6:27 Li RongQing
2021-08-31 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-09-01 7:19 ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2021-09-03 3:59 ` Li,Rongqing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YS44IzVARx2ZaEUo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--subject='Re: [Resend][PATCH] sched/fair: micro-optimize pick_next_entity()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).