LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: balance refcount for managed sw nodes
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:13:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YTn6dx2rRsLZ6GDJ@kuha.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2485ac73-6df6-3939-5ee5-ef650d951054@nxp.com>

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:59:18PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/26/2021 10:59 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 7/20/2021 1:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:22 PM Laurentiu Tudor
> >> <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> wrote:
> >>> On 7/19/2021 3:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 03:00:17PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> >>>>> On 7/16/2021 8:21 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 2:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
> >>>>>> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 01:16:02PM +0300, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>> From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> software_node_notify(), on KOBJ_REMOVE drops the refcount twice on managed
> >>>>>>>> software nodes, thus leading to underflow errors. Balance the refcount by
> >>>>>>>> bumping it in the device_create_managed_software_node() function.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The error [1] was encountered after adding a .shutdown() op to our
> >>>>>>>> fsl-mc-bus driver.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Looking into the history of adding ->shutdown() to dwc3 driver (it got reverted
> >>>>>>> later on), I can tell that probably something is wrong in the ->shutdown()
> >>>>>>> method itself.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Isn't the other alternative to just remove the second kobject_put from
> >>>>>> KOBJ_REMOVE ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or maybe on top of Heikki's suggestion, replace the calls to
> >>>>> sysfs_create_link() from KOBJ_ADD with sysfs_create_link_nowarn()?
> >>>>
> >>>> _noearn will hide the problem. It was there, it was removed from there.
> >>>> Perhaps we have to understand the root cause better (some specific flow?).
> >>>>
> >>>> Any insight from you on the flow when the issue appears? I.o.w. what happened
> >>>> on the big picture that we got into the warning you see?
> >>>
> >>> I encountered the initial issue when trying to shut down a system booted
> >>> with ACPI but only after adding a .shutdown() callback to our bus driver
> >>> so that the devices are properly taken down. The problem was that
> >>> software_node_notify(), on KOBJ_REMOVE was dropping the reference count
> >>> twice leading to an underflow error. My initial proposal was to just
> >>> bump the refcount in device_create_managed_software_node(). The device
> >>> properties that triggered the problem are created here [1].
> >>>
> >>> Heikko suggested that instead of manually incrementing the refcount to
> >>> use software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD). This triggered the second issue, a
> >>> duplicated sysfs entry warning originating in the usb subsystem:
> >>> device_create_managed_software_node() ends up being called twice, once
> >>> here [2] and secondly, the place I previous mentioned [1].
> >>
> >> This [3] is what I have reported against DWC3 when ->shutdown() has
> >> been added there. And here [4] is another thread about the issue with
> >> that callback. The ->release() callback is called at put_device() [5]
> >> and ->shutdown() is called before that [6]. That said, can you inspect
> >> your ->shutdown() implementation once more time and perhaps see if
> >> there is anything that can be amended?
> >>
> > 
> > Will do, thanks for the pointers. It could be that we mess something out
> > in how we use the driver model.
> > 
> 
> Quick (and late, sorry) update from my side. I've spent time on
> debugging our bus, did found some issues but, at least for now, none are
> related to sw node.
> In the mean time, I noticed in the swnode code that
> device_add_software_node() calls software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD) while
> device_create_managed_software_node() doesn't. Updating [1] the later
> with the call to software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD) does seem to fix the
> issue I'm seeing.
> 
> Could this be a problem? Any comments appreciated.
> 
> One more thing perhaps worth mentioning is that, at least for now, there
> are few uses for this device_create_managed_software_node() api,
> mentioning here a couple of them:
>  - arm64 iort code - this seems to be triggering the issue i'm getting
>  - dwc3 usb - Andy reported similar issues here, maybe the issue is common?
> 
> [1]
> @@ -1113,6 +1125,15 @@ int device_create_managed_software_node(struct
> device *dev,
>         to_swnode(fwnode)->managed = true;
>         set_secondary_fwnode(dev, fwnode);
> 
> +       /*
> +        * If the device has been fully registered by the time this
> function is
> +        * called, software_node_notify() must be called separately so
> that the
> +        * symlinks get created and the reference count of the node is
> kept in
> +        * balance.
> +        */
> +       if (device_is_registered(dev))
> +               software_node_notify(dev, KOBJ_ADD);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }

That should be fixed indeed. Please send that after -rc1 is out.

thanks,

-- 
heikki

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-09 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-16 10:16 laurentiu.tudor
2021-07-16 10:34 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-07-16 12:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-16 17:21   ` Jon Nettleton
2021-07-19 12:00     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-07-19 12:22       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-20  9:20         ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-07-20 10:27           ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-26  7:59             ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-07 15:59               ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-09 12:13                 ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
2021-09-09 12:16                   ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-09 14:01                     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-10 12:05                       ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-10 12:38                         ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-10 13:00                           ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-14 14:13                             ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-14 14:00 ` Heikki Krogerus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YTn6dx2rRsLZ6GDJ@kuha.fi.intel.com \
    --to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jon@solid-run.com \
    --cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] software node: balance refcount for managed sw nodes' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).