LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Cc: "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE" 
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: phy-stm32-usbphyc: add optional phy tuning properties
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:16:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWhz/AsfDX24iUR3@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a07f03d-ffaa-77f6-c223-74bae60eb3f1@foss.st.com>

On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:58:21PM +0200, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/6/21 2:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Disable child nodes while parent node is already disabled fixes the
> > > warning. But it means to add status = "okay"; in child nodes everywhere
> > > usbphyc is enabled.
> > Presumably, you already have to add phy-supply everywhere.
> >  >> Is it normal dtbs_check checks in child nodes when parent node is
> disabled?
> > I'll look into doing that.
> 
> Should I wait for your potential dtbs_check update or should I disable child
> nodes in .dtsi (and enable them along with parent node in .dts using
> usbphyc) ?

I pushed a fix to dt-validate for this.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-14 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-05 15:24 [PATCH v2 0/3] phy: stm32: add phy tuning support Amelie Delaunay
2021-10-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: stm32: restore utmi switch on resume Amelie Delaunay
2021-10-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: phy-stm32-usbphyc: add optional phy tuning properties Amelie Delaunay
2021-10-05 22:45   ` Rob Herring
2021-10-06  6:51     ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2021-10-06 12:38       ` Rob Herring
2021-10-06 12:58         ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2021-10-14 18:16           ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-10-15  9:10             ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2021-10-14 17:26   ` Rob Herring
2021-10-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] phy: stm32: add phy tuning support Amelie Delaunay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWhz/AsfDX24iUR3@robh.at.kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: phy-stm32-usbphyc: add optional phy tuning properties' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).