LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation
@ 2021-09-20 8:15 Jeya R
2021-09-20 9:08 ` Greg KH
2021-09-20 12:21 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeya R @ 2021-09-20 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-msm, srinivas.kandagatla
Cc: Jeya R, gregkh, linux-kernel, fastrpc.upstream
The buffer list is sorted and this is not being
considered while calculating packet size. This
would lead to improper copy length calculation
for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually
cause sending improper buffers to DSP.
Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
index beda610..a7e550f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
@@ -719,16 +719,21 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx)
static u64 fastrpc_get_payload_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, int metalen)
{
u64 size = 0;
- int i;
+ int oix = 0;
size = ALIGN(metalen, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
- for (i = 0; i < ctx->nscalars; i++) {
+ for (oix = 0; oix < ctx->nbufs; oix++) {
+ int i = ctx->olaps[oix].raix;
+
+ if (ctx->args[i].length == 0)
+ continue;
+
if (ctx->args[i].fd == 0 || ctx->args[i].fd == -1) {
- if (ctx->olaps[i].offset == 0)
+ if (ctx->olaps[oix].offset == 0)
size = ALIGN(size, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
- size += (ctx->olaps[i].mend - ctx->olaps[i].mstart);
+ size += (ctx->olaps[oix].mend - ctx->olaps[oix].mstart);
}
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation
2021-09-20 8:15 [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation Jeya R
@ 2021-09-20 9:08 ` Greg KH
2021-09-20 9:31 ` jeyr
2021-09-20 12:21 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2021-09-20 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeya R; +Cc: linux-arm-msm, srinivas.kandagatla, linux-kernel, fastrpc.upstream
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:45:31PM +0530, Jeya R wrote:
> The buffer list is sorted and this is not being
> considered while calculating packet size. This
> would lead to improper copy length calculation
> for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually
> cause sending improper buffers to DSP.
You do have the full 72 columns to use :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
What commit does this fix?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation
2021-09-20 9:08 ` Greg KH
@ 2021-09-20 9:31 ` jeyr
2021-09-20 9:46 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: jeyr @ 2021-09-20 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: linux-arm-msm, srinivas.kandagatla, linux-kernel, fastrpc.upstream
On 2021-09-20 14:38, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:45:31PM +0530, Jeya R wrote:
>> The buffer list is sorted and this is not being
>> considered while calculating packet size. This
>> would lead to improper copy length calculation
>> for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually
>> cause sending improper buffers to DSP.
>
> You do have the full 72 columns to use :)
Thanks, will update the commit message considering this.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> What commit does this fix?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Payload calculation function was modified to handle buffer overlapping
calculation in this commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c?h=v5.15-rc2&id=25e8dfb83cda0a123bb1e091d6c3599cde050d76
Here during buffer overlap calculation, the buffer list is getting
sorted. This needs to be considered during the calculation of payload
size also by using unsorted buffer index "raix".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation
2021-09-20 9:31 ` jeyr
@ 2021-09-20 9:46 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2021-09-20 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeyr; +Cc: linux-arm-msm, srinivas.kandagatla, linux-kernel, fastrpc.upstream
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:01:07PM +0530, jeyr@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2021-09-20 14:38, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:45:31PM +0530, Jeya R wrote:
> > > The buffer list is sorted and this is not being
> > > considered while calculating packet size. This
> > > would lead to improper copy length calculation
> > > for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually
> > > cause sending improper buffers to DSP.
> >
> > You do have the full 72 columns to use :)
>
> Thanks, will update the commit message considering this.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > What commit does this fix?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Payload calculation function was modified to handle buffer overlapping
> calculation in this commit:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c?h=v5.15-rc2&id=25e8dfb83cda0a123bb1e091d6c3599cde050d76
>
> Here during buffer overlap calculation, the buffer list is getting sorted.
> This needs to be considered during the calculation of payload size also by
> using unsorted buffer index "raix".
Ok, then please add a "Fixes:" tag when you resend this.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation
2021-09-20 8:15 [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation Jeya R
2021-09-20 9:08 ` Greg KH
@ 2021-09-20 12:21 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Srinivas Kandagatla @ 2021-09-20 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeya R, linux-arm-msm; +Cc: gregkh, linux-kernel, fastrpc.upstream
Thanks Jeya for the fix,
On 20/09/2021 09:15, Jeya R wrote:
> The buffer list is sorted and this is not being
> considered while calculating packet size. This
> would lead to improper copy length calculation
> for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually
> cause sending improper buffers to DSP.
>
we need below fixes tag:
Fixes: c68cfb718c8f ("misc: fastrpc: Add support for context Invoke method")
> Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index beda610..a7e550f 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -719,16 +719,21 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx)
> static u64 fastrpc_get_payload_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, int metalen)
> {
> u64 size = 0;
> - int i;
> + int oix = 0;
Unnecessary initialization here.
>
> size = ALIGN(metalen, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
> - for (i = 0; i < ctx->nscalars; i++) {
> + for (oix = 0; oix < ctx->nbufs; oix++) {
> + int i = ctx->olaps[oix].raix;
> +
[--
> + if (ctx->args[i].length == 0)
> + continue;
> +
--]
This additional check will not really have any effect on size
calculations, as (ctx->olaps[oix].mend - ctx->olaps[oix].mstart) would
result in zero.
Any reason why this check was added?
--srini
> if (ctx->args[i].fd == 0 || ctx->args[i].fd == -1) {
>
> - if (ctx->olaps[i].offset == 0)
> + if (ctx->olaps[oix].offset == 0)
> size = ALIGN(size, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
>
> - size += (ctx->olaps[i].mend - ctx->olaps[i].mstart);
> + size += (ctx->olaps[oix].mend - ctx->olaps[oix].mstart);
> }
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation
2021-09-21 10:35 Jeya R
@ 2021-09-21 10:39 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Srinivas Kandagatla @ 2021-09-21 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeya R, linux-arm-msm; +Cc: gregkh, linux-kernel, fastrpc.upstream
Hi Jeya,
Can you make sure the subject line reflects the patch version that you
are sending.
In this case it should be "[PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet
size calculation"
this will help reviewers and maintainers to differentiate the versions
of patch.
On 21/09/2021 11:35, Jeya R wrote:
> The buffer list is sorted and this is not being considered while
> calculating packet size. This would lead to improper copy length
> calculation for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually cause
> sending improper buffers to DSP.
>
> Fixes: c68cfb718c8f ("misc: fastrpc: Add support for context Invoke method")
> Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@codeaurora.org>
> ---
Please add changes done from v1 to v2 here.
something like:
Changes from v1:
- bla bla bla..
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index beda610..a7e550f 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -719,16 +719,21 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx)
> static u64 fastrpc_get_payload_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, int metalen)
> {
> u64 size = 0;
> - int i;
> + int oix = 0;
Looks like you missed to address my previous comments.
--srini
>
> size = ALIGN(metalen, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
> - for (i = 0; i < ctx->nscalars; i++) {
> + for (oix = 0; oix < ctx->nbufs; oix++) {
> + int i = ctx->olaps[oix].raix;
> +
> + if (ctx->args[i].length == 0)
> + continue;
> +
> if (ctx->args[i].fd == 0 || ctx->args[i].fd == -1) {
>
> - if (ctx->olaps[i].offset == 0)
> + if (ctx->olaps[oix].offset == 0)
> size = ALIGN(size, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
>
> - size += (ctx->olaps[i].mend - ctx->olaps[i].mstart);
> + size += (ctx->olaps[oix].mend - ctx->olaps[oix].mstart);
> }
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation
@ 2021-09-21 10:35 Jeya R
2021-09-21 10:39 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeya R @ 2021-09-21 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-msm, srinivas.kandagatla
Cc: Jeya R, gregkh, linux-kernel, fastrpc.upstream
The buffer list is sorted and this is not being considered while
calculating packet size. This would lead to improper copy length
calculation for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually cause
sending improper buffers to DSP.
Fixes: c68cfb718c8f ("misc: fastrpc: Add support for context Invoke method")
Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
index beda610..a7e550f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
@@ -719,16 +719,21 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx)
static u64 fastrpc_get_payload_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, int metalen)
{
u64 size = 0;
- int i;
+ int oix = 0;
size = ALIGN(metalen, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
- for (i = 0; i < ctx->nscalars; i++) {
+ for (oix = 0; oix < ctx->nbufs; oix++) {
+ int i = ctx->olaps[oix].raix;
+
+ if (ctx->args[i].length == 0)
+ continue;
+
if (ctx->args[i].fd == 0 || ctx->args[i].fd == -1) {
- if (ctx->olaps[i].offset == 0)
+ if (ctx->olaps[oix].offset == 0)
size = ALIGN(size, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
- size += (ctx->olaps[i].mend - ctx->olaps[i].mstart);
+ size += (ctx->olaps[oix].mend - ctx->olaps[oix].mstart);
}
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-21 10:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-20 8:15 [PATCH] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation Jeya R
2021-09-20 9:08 ` Greg KH
2021-09-20 9:31 ` jeyr
2021-09-20 9:46 ` Greg KH
2021-09-20 12:21 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-09-21 10:35 Jeya R
2021-09-21 10:39 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).