LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <hannes@stressinduktion.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>, Minmin chen <chenmingmin@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] once: Fix panic when module unload Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:15:09 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <a783f15a-5657-787e-fdbd-88f9e3645571@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YQ0+Yz+cWC0nh4uB@kroah.com> On 2021/8/6 21:51, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 06:43:28AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 16:21:24 +0800 Kefeng Wang wrote: >>> DO_ONCE >>> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(___once_key); >>> __do_once_done >>> once_disable_jump(once_key); >>> INIT_WORK(&w->work, once_deferred); >>> struct once_work *w; >>> w->key = key; >>> schedule_work(&w->work); module unload >>> //*the key is >>> destroy* >>> process_one_work >>> once_deferred >>> BUG_ON(!static_key_enabled(work->key)); >>> static_key_count((struct static_key *)x) //*access key, crash* >>> >>> When module uses DO_ONCE mechanism, it could crash due to the above >>> concurrency problem, we could reproduce it with link[1]. >>> >>> Fix it by add/put module refcount in the once work process. >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/eaa6c371-465e-57eb-6be9-f4b16b9d7cbf@huawei.com/ >> Seems reasonable. Greg does it look good to you? > Me? I was not paying attention to this at all, sorry... > >> I think we can take it thru networking since nobody cared to pick up v1. Thanks all ;) > Sure, I trust you :) > . >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-09 1:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-06 8:21 [PATCH v2] once: Fix panic when module unload Kefeng Wang 2021-08-06 13:43 ` Jakub Kicinski 2021-08-06 13:51 ` Greg KH 2021-08-09 1:15 ` Kefeng Wang [this message] 2021-08-06 15:22 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa 2021-08-09 1:13 ` Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=a783f15a-5657-787e-fdbd-88f9e3645571@huawei.com \ --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=chenmingmin@huawei.com \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=edumazet@google.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).