LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [V3 PATCH] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups
@ 2018-04-25 17:58 kan.liang
2018-04-26 16:14 ` Jiri Olsa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kan.liang @ 2018-04-25 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, mingo, peterz, linux-kernel
Cc: jolsa, namhyung, ganapatrao.kulkarni, zhangshaokun, yao.jin,
will.deacon, ak, agustinv, Kan Liang
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Perf stat doesn't count the uncore event aliases from the same uncore
block in a group, for example:
perf stat -e '{unc_m_cas_count.all,unc_m_clockticks}' -a -I 1000
# time counts unit events
1.000447342 <not counted> unc_m_cas_count.all
1.000447342 <not counted> unc_m_clockticks
2.000740654 <not counted> unc_m_cas_count.all
2.000740654 <not counted> unc_m_clockticks
The output is very misleading. It gives a wrong impression that the
uncore event doesn't work.
An uncore block could be composed by several PMUs. An uncore event alias
is a joint name which means the same event runs on all PMUs of a block.
Perf doesn't support mixed events from different PMUs in the same group.
It is wrong to put uncore event aliases in a big group.
The right way is to split the big group into multiple small groups which
only include the events from the same PMU.
Only uncore event aliases from the same uncore block should be specially
handled here. It doesn't make sense to mix the uncore events with other
uncore events from different blocks or even core events in a group.
With the patch:
# time counts unit events
1.001557653 140,833 unc_m_cas_count.all
1.001557653 1,330,231,332 unc_m_clockticks
2.002709483 85,007 unc_m_cas_count.all
2.002709483 1,429,494,563 unc_m_clockticks
Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
Change since V2:
- Fix a core dump caused by two exactly same evens in a group.
Adding a check in parse_events__set_leader_for_uncore_aliase() to
distinguish the leader from other members, even they have the same
event name.
tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 7 ++-
tools/perf/util/parse-events.y | 8 +--
4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
index 92ec009..b13f5f2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct perf_evsel {
bool precise_max;
bool ignore_missing_thread;
bool forced_leader;
+ bool use_uncore_alias;
/* parse modifier helper */
int exclude_GH;
int nr_members;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index 2fb0272..44c6f53 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -1219,13 +1219,16 @@ int parse_events_add_numeric(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
struct list_head *list, char *name,
- struct list_head *head_config, bool auto_merge_stats)
+ struct list_head *head_config,
+ bool auto_merge_stats,
+ bool use_alias)
{
struct perf_event_attr attr;
struct perf_pmu_info info;
struct perf_pmu *pmu;
struct perf_evsel *evsel;
struct parse_events_error *err = parse_state->error;
+ bool use_uncore_alias;
LIST_HEAD(config_terms);
pmu = perf_pmu__find(name);
@@ -1244,11 +1247,14 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
}
+ use_uncore_alias = (pmu->is_uncore && use_alias);
+
if (!head_config) {
attr.type = pmu->type;
evsel = __add_event(list, &parse_state->idx, &attr, NULL, pmu, NULL, auto_merge_stats);
if (evsel) {
evsel->pmu_name = name;
+ evsel->use_uncore_alias = use_uncore_alias;
return 0;
} else {
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1282,6 +1288,7 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
evsel->metric_expr = info.metric_expr;
evsel->metric_name = info.metric_name;
evsel->pmu_name = name;
+ evsel->use_uncore_alias = use_uncore_alias;
}
return evsel ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
@@ -1317,7 +1324,8 @@ int parse_events_multi_pmu_add(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
list_add_tail(&term->list, head);
if (!parse_events_add_pmu(parse_state, list,
- pmu->name, head, true)) {
+ pmu->name, head,
+ true, true)) {
pr_debug("%s -> %s/%s/\n", str,
pmu->name, alias->str);
ok++;
@@ -1339,7 +1347,99 @@ int parse_events__modifier_group(struct list_head *list,
return parse_events__modifier_event(list, event_mod, true);
}
-void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list)
+/*
+ * Check if the two uncore PMUs are from the same uncore block
+ * The format of the uncore PMU name is uncore_#blockname_#pmuidx
+ */
+static bool is_same_uncore_block(const char *pmu_name_a, const char *pmu_name_b)
+{
+ char *end_a, *end_b;
+
+ end_a = strrchr(pmu_name_a, '_');
+ end_b = strrchr(pmu_name_b, '_');
+
+ if (!end_a || !end_b)
+ return false;
+
+ if ((end_a - pmu_name_a) != (end_b - pmu_name_b))
+ return false;
+
+ return (strncmp(pmu_name_a, pmu_name_b, end_a - pmu_name_a) == 0);
+}
+
+static int
+parse_events__set_leader_for_uncore_aliase(char *name, struct list_head *list,
+ struct parse_events_state *parse_state)
+{
+ struct perf_evsel *evsel, *leader;
+ uintptr_t *leaders;
+ bool is_leader = true;
+ int i = 0, nr_pmu = 0, total_members, ret = 0;
+
+ leader = list_entry(list->next, struct perf_evsel, node);
+ evsel = list_entry(list->prev, struct perf_evsel, node);
+ total_members = evsel->idx - leader->idx + 1;
+
+ leaders = calloc(total_members, sizeof(uintptr_t));
+ if (!leaders)
+ return ret;
+
+ __evlist__for_each_entry(list, evsel) {
+
+ /* Only split the uncore group which members use alias */
+ if (!evsel->use_uncore_alias)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* The events must be from the same uncore block */
+ if (!is_same_uncore_block(leader->pmu_name, evsel->pmu_name))
+ goto out;
+
+ if (!is_leader)
+ continue;
+ /*
+ * If the event's PMU name starts to repeat, it must be a new
+ * event. That can be used to distinguish the leader from
+ * other members, even they have the same event name.
+ */
+ if ((leader != evsel) && (leader->pmu_name == evsel->pmu_name)) {
+ is_leader = false;
+ continue;
+ }
+ /* The name is always alias name */
+ WARN_ON(strcmp(leader->name, evsel->name));
+
+ leaders[nr_pmu++] = (uintptr_t) evsel;
+ }
+
+ /* only one event alias */
+ if (nr_pmu == total_members) {
+ parse_state->nr_groups--;
+ goto handled;
+ }
+
+ __evlist__for_each_entry(list, evsel) {
+ if (i >= nr_pmu)
+ i = 0;
+ evsel->leader = (struct perf_evsel *) leaders[i++];
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) {
+ evsel = (struct perf_evsel *) leaders[i];
+ evsel->nr_members = total_members / nr_pmu;
+ evsel->group_name = name ? strdup(name) : NULL;
+ }
+
+ parse_state->nr_groups += nr_pmu - 1;
+
+handled:
+ ret = 1;
+out:
+ free(leaders);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list,
+ struct parse_events_state *parse_state)
{
struct perf_evsel *leader;
@@ -1348,6 +1448,9 @@ void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list)
return;
}
+ if (parse_events__set_leader_for_uncore_aliase(name, list, parse_state))
+ return;
+
__perf_evlist__set_leader(list);
leader = list_entry(list->next, struct perf_evsel, node);
leader->group_name = name ? strdup(name) : NULL;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h
index 5015cfd..4473dac 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h
@@ -167,7 +167,9 @@ int parse_events_add_breakpoint(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
void *ptr, char *type, u64 len);
int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
struct list_head *list, char *name,
- struct list_head *head_config, bool auto_merge_stats);
+ struct list_head *head_config,
+ bool auto_merge_stats,
+ bool use_alias);
int parse_events_multi_pmu_add(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
char *str,
@@ -178,7 +180,8 @@ int parse_events_copy_term_list(struct list_head *old,
enum perf_pmu_event_symbol_type
perf_pmu__parse_check(const char *name);
-void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list);
+void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list,
+ struct parse_events_state *parse_state);
void parse_events_update_lists(struct list_head *list_event,
struct list_head *list_all);
void parse_events_evlist_error(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
index d14464c..47f6399 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ PE_NAME '{' events '}'
struct list_head *list = $3;
inc_group_count(list, _parse_state);
- parse_events__set_leader($1, list);
+ parse_events__set_leader($1, list, _parse_state);
$$ = list;
}
|
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ PE_NAME '{' events '}'
struct list_head *list = $2;
inc_group_count(list, _parse_state);
- parse_events__set_leader(NULL, list);
+ parse_events__set_leader(NULL, list, _parse_state);
$$ = list;
}
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ PE_NAME '/' event_config '/'
YYABORT;
ALLOC_LIST(list);
- if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $3, false)) {
+ if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $3, false, false)) {
struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
int ok = 0;
char *pattern;
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ PE_NAME '/' event_config '/'
free(pattern);
YYABORT;
}
- if (!parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, pmu->name, terms, true))
+ if (!parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, pmu->name, terms, true, false))
ok++;
parse_events_terms__delete(terms);
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [V3 PATCH] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups
2018-04-25 17:58 [V3 PATCH] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups kan.liang
@ 2018-04-26 16:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-04-26 16:48 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2018-04-26 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kan.liang
Cc: acme, mingo, peterz, linux-kernel, namhyung, ganapatrao.kulkarni,
zhangshaokun, yao.jin, will.deacon, ak, agustinv
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:58:43AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
SNIP
> -void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list)
> +/*
> + * Check if the two uncore PMUs are from the same uncore block
> + * The format of the uncore PMU name is uncore_#blockname_#pmuidx
> + */
> +static bool is_same_uncore_block(const char *pmu_name_a, const char *pmu_name_b)
> +{
> + char *end_a, *end_b;
> +
> + end_a = strrchr(pmu_name_a, '_');
> + end_b = strrchr(pmu_name_b, '_');
> +
> + if (!end_a || !end_b)
> + return false;
> +
> + if ((end_a - pmu_name_a) != (end_b - pmu_name_b))
> + return false;
> +
> + return (strncmp(pmu_name_a, pmu_name_b, end_a - pmu_name_a) == 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +parse_events__set_leader_for_uncore_aliase(char *name, struct list_head *list,
> + struct parse_events_state *parse_state)
> +{
> + struct perf_evsel *evsel, *leader;
> + uintptr_t *leaders;
> + bool is_leader = true;
> + int i = 0, nr_pmu = 0, total_members, ret = 0;
> +
> + leader = list_entry(list->next, struct perf_evsel, node);
> + evsel = list_entry(list->prev, struct perf_evsel, node);
could you please use list_last_entry and list_first_entry in here?
> + total_members = evsel->idx - leader->idx + 1;
> +
> + leaders = calloc(total_members, sizeof(uintptr_t));
> + if (!leaders)
> + return ret;
returns 0 in here
> +
> + __evlist__for_each_entry(list, evsel) {
> +
> + /* Only split the uncore group which members use alias */
> + if (!evsel->use_uncore_alias)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* The events must be from the same uncore block */
> + if (!is_same_uncore_block(leader->pmu_name, evsel->pmu_name))
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!is_leader)
> + continue;
> + /*
> + * If the event's PMU name starts to repeat, it must be a new
> + * event. That can be used to distinguish the leader from
> + * other members, even they have the same event name.
> + */
> + if ((leader != evsel) && (leader->pmu_name == evsel->pmu_name)) {
> + is_leader = false;
setting "is_leader = false" basically breaks the loop,
because of that !leader check above, so why continue?
> + continue;
> + }
> + /* The name is always alias name */
> + WARN_ON(strcmp(leader->name, evsel->name));
> +
> + leaders[nr_pmu++] = (uintptr_t) evsel;
> + }
> +
> + /* only one event alias */
> + if (nr_pmu == total_members) {
> + parse_state->nr_groups--;
> + goto handled;
> + }
> +
> + __evlist__for_each_entry(list, evsel) {
> + if (i >= nr_pmu)
> + i = 0;
> + evsel->leader = (struct perf_evsel *) leaders[i++];
> + }
it's not so obvious from the code how the groups
are set.. please describe that logic in the comment
thanks,
jirka
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) {
> + evsel = (struct perf_evsel *) leaders[i];
> + evsel->nr_members = total_members / nr_pmu;
> + evsel->group_name = name ? strdup(name) : NULL;
> + }
> +
> + parse_state->nr_groups += nr_pmu - 1;
> +
> +handled:
> + ret = 1;
> +out:
> + free(leaders);
> + return ret;
> +}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [V3 PATCH] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups
2018-04-26 16:14 ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2018-04-26 16:48 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2018-04-26 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa
Cc: acme, mingo, peterz, linux-kernel, namhyung, ganapatrao.kulkarni,
zhangshaokun, yao.jin, will.deacon, ak, agustinv
On 4/26/2018 12:14 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:58:43AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> -void parse_events__set_leader(char *name, struct list_head *list)
>> +/*
>> + * Check if the two uncore PMUs are from the same uncore block
>> + * The format of the uncore PMU name is uncore_#blockname_#pmuidx
>> + */
>> +static bool is_same_uncore_block(const char *pmu_name_a, const char *pmu_name_b)
>> +{
>> + char *end_a, *end_b;
>> +
>> + end_a = strrchr(pmu_name_a, '_');
>> + end_b = strrchr(pmu_name_b, '_');
>> +
>> + if (!end_a || !end_b)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if ((end_a - pmu_name_a) != (end_b - pmu_name_b))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return (strncmp(pmu_name_a, pmu_name_b, end_a - pmu_name_a) == 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +parse_events__set_leader_for_uncore_aliase(char *name, struct list_head *list,
>> + struct parse_events_state *parse_state)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_evsel *evsel, *leader;
>> + uintptr_t *leaders;
>> + bool is_leader = true;
>> + int i = 0, nr_pmu = 0, total_members, ret = 0;
>> +
>> + leader = list_entry(list->next, struct perf_evsel, node);
>> + evsel = list_entry(list->prev, struct perf_evsel, node);
>
> could you please use list_last_entry and list_first_entry in here?
>
Sure.
>> + total_members = evsel->idx - leader->idx + 1;
>> +
>> + leaders = calloc(total_members, sizeof(uintptr_t));
>> + if (!leaders)
>> + return ret;
>
> returns 0 in here
OK
>
>> +
>> + __evlist__for_each_entry(list, evsel) {
>> +
>> + /* Only split the uncore group which members use alias */
>> + if (!evsel->use_uncore_alias)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /* The events must be from the same uncore block */
>> + if (!is_same_uncore_block(leader->pmu_name, evsel->pmu_name))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + if (!is_leader)
>> + continue;
>> + /*
>> + * If the event's PMU name starts to repeat, it must be a new
>> + * event. That can be used to distinguish the leader from
>> + * other members, even they have the same event name.
>> + */
>> + if ((leader != evsel) && (leader->pmu_name == evsel->pmu_name)) {
>> + is_leader = false;
>
> setting "is_leader = false" basically breaks the loop,
> because of that !leader check above, so why continue?
>
Because the evsel doesn't belong to leader anymore.
We should not add it into leaders[].
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + /* The name is always alias name */
>> + WARN_ON(strcmp(leader->name, evsel->name));
>> +
>> + leaders[nr_pmu++] = (uintptr_t) evsel;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* only one event alias */
>> + if (nr_pmu == total_members) {
>> + parse_state->nr_groups--;
>> + goto handled;
>> + }
>> +
>> + __evlist__for_each_entry(list, evsel) {
>> + if (i >= nr_pmu)
>> + i = 0;
>> + evsel->leader = (struct perf_evsel *) leaders[i++];
>> + }
>
> it's not so obvious from the code how the groups
> are set.. please describe that logic in the comment
>
Sure. I will add more comments.
Thanks,
Kan
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) {
>> + evsel = (struct perf_evsel *) leaders[i];
>> + evsel->nr_members = total_members / nr_pmu;
>> + evsel->group_name = name ? strdup(name) : NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + parse_state->nr_groups += nr_pmu - 1;
>> +
>> +handled:
>> + ret = 1;
>> +out:
>> + free(leaders);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-26 16:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-25 17:58 [V3 PATCH] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups kan.liang
2018-04-26 16:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-04-26 16:48 ` Liang, Kan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).