From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755216AbXD0DMq (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:12:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755212AbXD0DMq (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:12:46 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:26959 "EHLO sj-iport-5.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755211AbXD0DMo (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:12:44 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,457,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="416154857:sNHT44688932" To: Steve Wise Cc: jeff@garzik.org, divy@chelsio.com, general@lists.openfabrics.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22 5/5] iw_cxgb3: Update required firmware revision to 4.0.0. X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: <20070426202057.24234.56383.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> <20070426202126.24234.71523.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> From: Roland Dreier Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:12:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20070426202126.24234.71523.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> (Steve Wise's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:21:26 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2007 03:12:43.0044 (UTC) FILETIME=[EBB77E40:01C78879] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-6; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim6002 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Update required firmware revision to 4.0.0. Hmm... should we fold this into the earlier patch, which actually needs this new FW? Or at least merge this patch first? Also, is it cool with everyone to require a new FW, even for users who might not be using (or even building) the RDMA driver? I'm not sure what a good solution would be really, so maybe the pain of forcing everyone to update FW is the least bad thing to do. - R.