LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6: possible recursive locking detected
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 01:20:17 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.999999.0801060118290.4821@sheep.housecafe.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801051242070.3896@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> A solution may be to move the call to ep_poll_safewake() (that'd become a
> simple wake_up()) inside a tasklet or whatever is today trendy for delayed
> work. But his kinda scares me to be honest, since epoll has already a
> bunch of places where it could be asynchronously hit (plus performance
> regression will need to be verified).

Although I'm not able to reproduce this one right now, I'm happy to test 
any patches you guys come up with.

Thanks for your time,
Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #78:

Yes, yes, its called a design limitation

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-06  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-03 22:58 Christian Kujau
2008-01-03 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04  8:30   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-05  7:12     ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-05 16:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-05 17:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-05 21:35           ` Davide Libenzi
2008-01-06  0:20             ` Christian Kujau [this message]
2008-01-07 21:35               ` Davide Libenzi
2008-01-06 21:44             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-01-06 21:53               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-01-07 17:22           ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-01-07 17:49             ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-01-13 16:32               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-14 21:27                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-01-30 10:34                   ` hrtimers and lockdep (was: Re: 2.6.24-rc6: possible recursive locking detected) Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-30 17:36                     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.0.999999.0801060118290.4821@sheep.housecafe.de \
    --to=lists@nerdbynature.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --subject='Re: 2.6.24-rc6: possible recursive locking detected' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).