LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 5/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:45:04 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0802291644060.30883@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0802291642290.30883@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Adds another optional mode flag, MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES, that specifies
nodemasks passed via set_mempolicy() or mbind() should be considered
relative to the current task's mems_allowed.
When the mempolicy is created, the passed nodemask is folded and mapped
onto the current task's mems_allowed. For example, consider a task
using set_mempolicy() to pass MPOL_INTERLEAVE | MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES
with a nodemask of 1-3. If current's mems_allowed is 4-7, the effected
nodemask is 5-7 (the second, third, and fourth node of mems_allowed).
If the same task is attached to a cpuset, the mempolicy nodemask is
rebound each time the mems are changed. Some possible rebinds and
results are:
mems result
1-3 1-3
1-7 2-4
1,5-6 1,5-6
1,5-7 5-7
Likewise, the zonelist built for MPOL_BIND acts on the set of zones
assigned to the resultant nodemask from the relative remap.
In the MPOL_PREFERRED case, the preferred node is remapped from the
currently effected nodemask to the relative nodemask.
This mempolicy mode flag was conceived of by Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>.
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
include/linux/mempolicy.h | 3 ++-
mm/mempolicy.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
mm/shmem.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
--- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -25,12 +25,13 @@ enum {
/* Flags for set_mempolicy */
#define MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES (1 << 15)
+#define MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (1 << 14)
/*
* MPOL_MODE_FLAGS is the union of all possible optional mode flags passed to
* either set_mempolicy() or mbind().
*/
-#define MPOL_MODE_FLAGS (MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES)
+#define MPOL_MODE_FLAGS (MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES | MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)
/* Flags for get_mempolicy */
#define MPOL_F_NODE (1<<0) /* return next IL mode instead of node mask */
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -152,7 +152,15 @@ static struct zonelist *bind_zonelist(nodemask_t *nodes)
static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol)
{
- return pol->flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES;
+ return pol->flags & (MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES | MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES);
+}
+
+static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodemask_t *ret, const nodemask_t *orig,
+ const nodemask_t *rel)
+{
+ nodemask_t tmp;
+ nodes_fold(tmp, *orig, nodes_weight(*rel));
+ nodes_onto(*ret, tmp, *rel);
}
/* Create a new policy */
@@ -173,7 +181,12 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(unsigned short mode, unsigned short flags,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
atomic_set(&policy->refcnt, 1);
cpuset_update_task_memory_state();
- nodes_and(cpuset_context_nmask, *nodes, cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
+ if (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)
+ mpol_relative_nodemask(&cpuset_context_nmask, nodes,
+ &cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
+ else
+ nodes_and(cpuset_context_nmask, *nodes,
+ cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
switch (mode) {
case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
if (nodes_empty(*nodes) || nodes_empty(cpuset_context_nmask))
@@ -898,6 +911,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
if (mode >= MPOL_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
+ if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) &&
+ (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
+ return -EINVAL;
err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -916,6 +932,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_set_mempolicy(int mode, unsigned long __user *nmask,
mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
if ((unsigned int)mode >= MPOL_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
+ if ((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
+ return -EINVAL;
err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -1747,10 +1765,12 @@ static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol,
{
nodemask_t tmp;
int static_nodes;
+ int relative_nodes;
if (!pol)
return;
static_nodes = pol->flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES;
+ relative_nodes = pol->flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES;
if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) &&
nodes_equal(pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, *newmask))
return;
@@ -1761,6 +1781,9 @@ static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol,
case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
if (static_nodes)
nodes_and(tmp, pol->w.user_nodemask, *newmask);
+ else if (relative_nodes)
+ mpol_relative_nodemask(&tmp, &pol->w.user_nodemask,
+ newmask);
else {
nodes_remap(tmp, pol->v.nodes,
pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, *newmask);
@@ -1783,6 +1806,10 @@ static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol,
pol->v.preferred_node = node;
else
pol->v.preferred_node = -1;
+ } else if (relative_nodes) {
+ mpol_relative_nodemask(&tmp, &pol->w.user_nodemask,
+ newmask);
+ pol->v.preferred_node = first_node(tmp);
} else {
pol->v.preferred_node = node_remap(pol->v.preferred_node,
pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, *newmask);
@@ -1794,6 +1821,9 @@ static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol,
if (static_nodes)
nodes_and(tmp, pol->w.user_nodemask, *newmask);
+ else if (relative_nodes)
+ mpol_relative_nodemask(&tmp, &pol->w.user_nodemask,
+ newmask);
else {
nodemask_t nodes;
struct zone **z;
@@ -1911,6 +1941,8 @@ static inline int mpol_to_str(char *buffer, int maxlen, struct mempolicy *pol)
if (flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES)
p += sprintf(p, "%sstatic", need_bar++ ? "|" : "");
+ if (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)
+ p += sprintf(p, "%srelative", need_bar++ ? "|" : "");
}
if (!nodes_empty(nodes)) {
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1131,6 +1131,12 @@ static int shmem_parse_mpol(char *value, unsigned short *policy,
if (flags) {
if (!strcmp(flags, "static"))
*mode_flags |= MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES;
+ if (!strcmp(flags, "relative"))
+ *mode_flags |= MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES;
+
+ if ((*mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) &&
+ (*mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
+ err = 1;
}
out:
/* Restore string for error message */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-01 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-01 0:44 [patch 1/6] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum David Rientjes
2008-03-01 0:45 ` [patch 2/6] mempolicy: support optional mode flags David Rientjes
2008-03-01 0:45 ` [patch 3/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag David Rientjes
2008-03-01 0:45 ` [patch 4/6] mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations David Rientjes
2008-03-01 0:45 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2008-03-01 0:45 ` [patch 6/6] mempolicy: update NUMA memory policy documentation David Rientjes
2008-03-01 0:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-03-01 1:14 ` David Rientjes
2008-03-03 7:17 ` [patch 1/6] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-25 15:35 David Rientjes
2008-02-25 15:35 ` [patch 2/6] mempolicy: support optional mode flags David Rientjes
2008-02-25 15:35 ` [patch 3/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag David Rientjes
2008-02-25 15:35 ` [patch 4/6] mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations David Rientjes
2008-02-25 15:35 ` [patch 5/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag David Rientjes
2008-02-26 6:12 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-26 6:45 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-26 17:44 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-26 21:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-26 21:30 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-26 21:27 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-27 1:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-27 1:31 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-27 2:30 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-27 15:37 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-27 17:09 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 21:08 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.0802291644060.30883@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--subject='Re: [patch 5/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).