LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/jump_label: Use text_poke_early() during early_init
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:28:29 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1811052126310.1659@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXwci8L=53UTq8=LEs+5yPgdHnidFf6iz3wZ0SkZwd1Eg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:25 AM Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> wrote:
> Linus, hpa, or Dave, a question for you: suppose I map some page
> writably, write to it, then upgrade permissions to allow execute.
> Must I force all CPUs that might execute from it without first
> serializing to serialize?  I suspect this doesn't really affect user
> code, but it may affect the module loader.
> 
> To be safe, shouldn't the module loader broadcast an IPI to
> sync_core() everywhere after loading a module and before making it
> runnable, regardless of alternative patching?
> 
> IOW, the right sequence of events probably ought to me:
> 
> 1. Allocate the memory and map it.
> 2. Copy in the text.
> 3. Patch alternatives, etc.  This is logically just like (2) from an
> architectural perspective -- we're just writing to memory that won't
> be executed.
> 4. Serialize everything.
> 5. Run it!

I'd make that:

1. Allocate the memory and map it RW
2. Copy in the text.
3. Patch alternatives, etc.  This is logically just like (2) from an
   architectural perspective -- we're just writing to memory that won't
   be executed.
4. Map it RX
5. Serialize everything.
6. Run it!

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-05 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-02 23:29 [PATCH v3 0/7] x86/alternatives: text_poke() fixes Nadav Amit
2018-11-02 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] Fix "x86/alternatives: Lockdep-enforce text_mutex in text_poke*()" Nadav Amit
2018-11-03 10:11   ` Jiri Kosina
2018-11-04 20:58   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-05 18:14     ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-02 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/jump_label: Use text_poke_early() during early_init Nadav Amit
2018-11-05 12:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-05 13:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-05 14:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-05 17:22     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-05 17:49       ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-05 19:03         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-05 19:25           ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-05 20:05             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-05 20:28               ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-11-05 21:31                 ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-07 19:13     ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-08 10:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-02 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] x86/mm: temporary mm struct Nadav Amit
2018-11-02 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] fork: provide a function for copying init_mm Nadav Amit
2018-11-02 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] x86/alternatives: initializing temporary mm for patching Nadav Amit
2018-11-02 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/alternatives: use temporary mm for text poking Nadav Amit
2018-11-05 13:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-05 13:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-05 18:04     ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-06  8:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-06 13:11         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-06 18:11           ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-06 19:08             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-02 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/alternatives: remove text_poke() return value Nadav Amit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1811052126310.1659@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/jump_label: Use text_poke_early() during early_init' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).