LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <>
To: Harvey Harrison <>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	Jiri Slaby <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>
Subject: Re: feature-removal-schedule.txt is getting out of date again
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:35:03 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802070533190.20096@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202327360.5820.24.camel@brick>

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:54 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > >   yes, i realize i'm sounding like a broken record but, once again,
> > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt is slipping out of date WRT
> > > items that are now slightly, if not noticeably, behind schedule for
> > > removal.
> >
> I had pinged people about a week ago on lots of these items, for the
> most part patches are staged and going in through various trees,
> let's wait for rc1 and see what has landed by then.

ah, i had no idea that things were in the pipeline.  that's always
good to know but, still, it's not a bad idea to keep the info in the
features removal file as least *vaguely* up to date.  at the very
least, if something seems to be more than a year behind schedule for
removal, then a small addendum to that item in that file by way of
explanation might be in order.


Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Home page:                               
Fedora Cookbook:

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-07 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-06  9:20 Robert P. J. Day
2008-02-06 19:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-06 19:49   ` Harvey Harrison
2008-02-06 20:07     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-07 10:35     ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2008-02-06 19:56   ` Harvey Harrison
2008-02-07 17:31   ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.00.0802070533190.20096@localhost.localdomain \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: feature-removal-schedule.txt is getting out of date again' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).