LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan.Brunelle@hp.com,
arjan@linux.intel.com, dgc@sgi.com, npiggin@suse.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:42:56 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802070940230.2883@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207104901.GF16735@elte.hu>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rq->hash);
> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rq->rb_node);
> - rq->ioprio = 0;
> - rq->buffer = NULL;
> - rq->ref_count = 1;
> - rq->q = q;
> - rq->special = NULL;
> - rq->data_len = 0;
> - rq->data = NULL;
> - rq->nr_phys_segments = 0;
> - rq->sense = NULL;
> - rq->end_io = NULL;
> - rq->end_io_data = NULL;
> - rq->completion_data = NULL;
> - rq->next_rq = NULL;
> + rq->completion_data = NULL;
> + /* rq->elevator_private */
> + /* rq->elevator_private2 */
> + /* rq->rq_disk */
> + /* rq->start_time */
> + rq->nr_phys_segments = 0;
> + /* rq->nr_hw_segments */
> + rq->ioprio = 0;
> + rq->special = NULL;
> + rq->buffer = NULL;
...
Can we please just stop doing these one-by-one assignments, and just do
something like
memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
rq->q = q;
rq->ref_count = 1;
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rq->hash);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rq->rb_node);
instead?
The memset() is likely faster and smaller than one-by-one assignments
anyway, even if the one-by-ones can avoid initializing some field or there
ends up being a double initialization..
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-07 9:18 [PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 9:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: split softirq handling into blk-softirq.c Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 9:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] Add interface for queuing work on a specific CPU Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 9:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 9:49 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 17:44 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-02-11 10:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-02-07 9:19 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: make kblockd_schedule_work() take the queue as parameter Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 9:19 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86: add support for remotely triggering the block softirq Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-07 10:17 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-07 10:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-07 14:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 10:49 ` [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes Ingo Molnar
2008-02-07 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-02-07 17:55 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 19:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-07 20:06 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-08 1:22 ` David Miller
2008-02-08 1:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-08 15:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-08 22:44 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-08 22:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-08 23:58 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-08 11:38 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 9:19 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86-64: add support for remotely triggering the block softirq Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 9:19 ` [PATCH 6/8] ia64: " Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 9:19 ` [PATCH 7/8] kernel: add generic softirq interface for triggering a remote softirq Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 9:19 ` [PATCH 8/8] block: add test code for testing CPU affinity Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity Alan D. Brunelle
2008-02-07 18:25 ` IO queuing and complete affinity with threads (was Re: [PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity) Jens Axboe
2008-02-07 20:40 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-02-08 7:38 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-08 7:47 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-08 7:53 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-08 7:59 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-08 8:12 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-08 8:24 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-08 8:33 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-11 5:22 ` David Chinner
2008-02-12 8:28 ` Jeremy Higdon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.00.0802070940230.2883@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Alan.Brunelle@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@gmail.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--subject='Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).