LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	hans.rosenfeld@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: bisected boot regression post 2.6.25-rc3.. please revert
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 10:44:14 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803031042230.17889@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CC451A.2060501@linux.intel.com>



On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> interesting observation: if I turn the macros into inlines... the difference
> goes away.
> 
> I'm half tempted to just do it as inline period ... any objections ?

Yes, I object. I want to understand why it would matter. If this is a 
compiler bug, it's a really rather bad one. And if it's just some stupid 
bug in our pmd_bad() macro, I still want to know what the problem was.

Can you compile both ways and look at what changed at the offending site 
(which is apparently "follow_page()")?

And do you have some odd compiler version?

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-03 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-01 18:56 Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-03  7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03  9:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 16:41     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-03 17:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 17:51         ` Nish Aravamudan
2008-03-03 17:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 17:58             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03 18:36         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-03 18:44           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-03-03 22:00             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-04  1:05               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-04  6:53                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-05 15:35                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-09 11:56             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-09 17:27               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-09 18:57                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-10  2:45                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-10  4:35                 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-03-03 21:13           ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-03 21:22             ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-03 22:33               ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-03 22:55                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03 22:56                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-03 23:04                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-04  6:58             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 17:15 ` Nish Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.00.0803031042230.17889@woody.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --subject='Re: bisected boot regression post 2.6.25-rc3.. please revert' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).