From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755191AbYCJRPU (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:15:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754883AbYCJRPB (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:15:01 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51661 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754873AbYCJRO7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:14:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:14:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Ingo Molnar cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown Subject: Re: [patch] fix ACPI boot regression (was: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc5) In-Reply-To: <20080310170434.GA22430@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20080310170434.GA22430@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > so zero-extending the result in the PCI-BIOS read routine fixes the > regression on my laptop. ( It might fix some other long-standing issues > we had with PCI-BIOS during the past decade ... ) Both 8-bit and 16-bit > accesses were buggy. Oh, wow. That must have been there forever, but very few people probably ever cared. And why is your laptop using the BIOS routines anyway? Or was that just a result of your randconfig having turned off the sane config access routines? Linus