LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] m68k: Set default dma mask for platform devices
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 15:25:39 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1805191408270.23@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180518090434.GC24436@lst.de>

On Fri, 18 May 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> > This implementation of arch_setup_pdev_archdata() differs from the 
> > powerpc one, in that this one avoids clobbering a device dma mask 
> > which has already been initialized.
> 
> I think your implementation should move into the generic implementation 
> in drivers/base/platform.c instead of being stuck in m68k.
> 
> Also powerpc probably wants fixing, but that's something left to the
> ppc folks..

On powerpc, all platform devices get a dma mask. But they don't do that in 
drivers/base/platform.c, they use arch_setup_pdev_archdata(). Why didn't 
they take the approach you suggest?

How would I support the claim that replacing an empty platform device dma 
mask with 0xffffffff is safe on all architectures and platforms?

Is there no code conditional upon dev.coherent_dma_mask or dev.dma_mask 
that could misbehave? (Didn't I cite an example in the other thread?*)

If you can convince me that it is safe, I'd be happy to submit the patch 
you asked for.

For now, I still think that patching the platform driver was the correct 
patch*.

Maybe the real problem is your commit 205e1b7f51e4 ("dma-mapping: warn 
when there is no coherent_dma_mask"), because it assumes that all dma_ops 
implementations care about coherent_dma_mask.

The dma_map_ops implementations that do use coherent_dma_mask should 
simply fail when it is unset, right?

Would it not be better to revert your patch and fix the dma_map_ops 
failure paths, than to somehow audit all the platform drivers and patch 
drivers/base/platform.c?

Thanks.

* https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LNX.2.21.1805091804290.72%40nippy.intranet

-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-19  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17 10:07 Finn Thain
2018-05-18  9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-19  5:25   ` Finn Thain [this message]
2018-05-30 19:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.21.1805191408270.23@nippy.intranet \
    --to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] m68k: Set default dma mask for platform devices' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).