LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd@twofifty.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] i40e X722 RSS problem with NAT-Traversal IPsec packets
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 13:49:38 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.21.9999.1906071343460.809@chris.i8u.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0Ue1M8_30PVPmoJy_EGo2mjM26ecz32Myx-hpnuq_6wdjw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:39 AM Lennart Sorensen
> <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:39:56AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>> OK I applied those two patches and get this:
>>>
>>> i40e: Intel(R) Ethernet Connection XL710 Network Driver - version 2.1.7-k
>>> i40e: Copyright (c) 2013 - 2014 Intel Corporation.
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: fw 3.10.52896 api 1.6 nvm 4.00 0x80001577 1.1767.0
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: The driver for the device detected a newer version of the NVM image than expected. Please install the most recent version of the network driver.
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: MAC address: a4:bf:01:4e:0c:87
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: PFQF_HREGION[7]: 0x00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: PFQF_HREGION[6]: 0x00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: PFQF_HREGION[5]: 0x00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: PFQF_HREGION[4]: 0x00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: PFQF_HREGION[3]: 0x00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: PFQF_HREGION[2]: 0x00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: PFQF_HREGION[1]: 0x00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: PFQF_HREGION[0]: 0x00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 63 input_mask:0x0000000000004000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 46 input_mask:0x0007fff800000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 45 input_mask:0x0007fff800000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 44 input_mask:0x0007ffff80000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 43 input_mask:0x0007fffe00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 42 input_mask:0x0007fffe00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 41 input_mask:0x0007fffe00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 40 input_mask:0x0007fffe00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 39 input_mask:0x0007fffe00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 36 input_mask:0x0006060000000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 35 input_mask:0x0006060000000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 34 input_mask:0x0006060780000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 33 input_mask:0x0006060600000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 32 input_mask:0x0006060600000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 31 input_mask:0x0006060600000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 30 input_mask:0x0006060600000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 29 input_mask:0x0006060600000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 27 input_mask:0x00000000002c0000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow_type: 26 input_mask:0x00000000002c0000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow type: 36 update input mask from:0x0006060000000000, to:0x0001801800000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow type: 35 update input mask from:0x0006060000000000, to:0x0001801800000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow type: 34 update input mask from:0x0006060780000000, to:0x0001801f80000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow type: 33 update input mask from:0x0006060600000000, to:0x0001801e00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow type: 32 update input mask from:0x0006060600000000, to:0x0001801e00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow type: 31 update input mask from:0x0006060600000000, to:0x0001801e00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow type: 30 update input mask from:0x0006060600000000, to:0x0001801e00000000
>>> i40e 0000:3d:00.0: flow type: 29 update input mask from:0x0006060600000000, to:0x0001801e00000000
>>>
>>> So seems the regions are all 0.
>>>
>>> All ipsec packets still hitting queue 0.
>>
>> So any news or more ideas to try or are we stuck hoping someone can fix
>> the firmware?
>
> I had reached out to some folks over in the networking division hoping
> that they can get a reproduction as I don't have the hardware that you
> are seeing the issue on so I have no way to reproduce it.
>
> Maybe someone from that group can reply and tell us where they are on that?
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Alex
For some reason this isn't showing up in my work email. We had an
internal conference this week and I think people are away. I'll see if I
can chase some people down if they're still here and not on the way
home.
--
Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd@twofifty.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-07 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-01 20:52 i40e X722 RSS problem with NAT-Traversal IPsec packets Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-01 22:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2019-05-02 15:11 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-02 17:03 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-02 17:16 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-02 17:28 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-02 17:55 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-02 18:52 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-02 20:59 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-03 15:14 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-03 17:19 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-03 20:59 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-13 16:55 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-13 19:04 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-14 16:34 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-16 17:10 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-16 18:34 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-16 18:37 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-16 23:32 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-17 16:42 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-17 17:23 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-17 22:20 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-21 15:15 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-21 16:51 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-21 17:54 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-05-21 23:22 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-05-22 14:39 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-06-07 14:39 ` Lennart Sorensen
2019-06-07 19:32 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-06-07 20:49 ` Hisashi T Fujinaka [this message]
2019-06-07 22:08 ` [E1000-devel] " Fujinaka, Todd
2019-06-10 19:01 ` Lennart Sorensen
2020-02-07 21:51 ` Lennart Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.NEB.2.21.9999.1906071343460.809@chris.i8u.org \
--to=htodd@twofifty.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).