LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org> Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>, "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code. Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 10:24:44 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <b291e1da-47a7-32b9-ab36-90f65b2a961a@wdc.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190529104801.GA13155@e107155-lin> On 5/29/19 3:48 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: >> Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe >> their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to >> a common place instead of duplicate code. >> > > I couldn't test this on any ARM64 server platforms, tested on Juno > and other embedded platforms. > Jeff had tested earlier patch series on ARM64 server platform. Since then, the series has changed. Even though, I don't expect it break ARM64, if it can be verified again that would be great. @Jeff: Can you give it a shot if you have some time ? > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Thanks! >> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> >> Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 23 --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +----------------------------- >> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 28 +++ >> include/linux/topology.h | 1 + >> 5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-) >> > > [...] > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c >> index 0825c4a856e3..6b95c91e7d67 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c >> > > [...] > >> -static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth) >> -{ >> - char name[10]; >> - bool leaf = true; >> - bool has_cores = false; >> - struct device_node *c; >> - static int package_id __initdata; >> - int core_id = 0; > > [Ultra minor nit]: you seem to have reordered the above declaration when > you moved, just noticed as it showed up when comparing. > Arrgh. Sorry! I think I was trying to fix a checkpatch or something and forgot to revert. I will update it. >> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c >> index 1739d7e1952a..20a960131bee 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c > > [...] > >> + >> +static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth) >> +{ >> + char name[10]; >> + bool leaf = true; >> + bool has_cores = false; >> + int core_id = 0; >> + static int package_id __initdata; >> + struct device_node *c; >> + int i, ret; >> + > > [...] > >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_RISCV) >> +void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpu); >> +#endif >> +void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid); >> + > > Another thing(not a block and we can do it once this is merged) is to > remove these #ifdefs > This #ifdef is removed in patch 4. But we should remove the other ones around init_cpu_topology, parse_dt_topology and friends in a follow up patch once this is merged. > -- > Regards, > Sudeep > -- Regards, Atish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-29 17:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-24 0:06 [RFT PATCH v5 0/5] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V Atish Patra 2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: DT: arm: add support for sockets defining package boundaries Atish Patra 2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 2/5] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding Atish Patra 2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code Atish Patra 2019-05-24 8:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2019-05-24 8:57 ` Sudeep Holla 2019-05-24 9:38 ` Will Deacon 2019-05-29 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla 2019-05-29 17:24 ` Atish Patra [this message] 2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 4/5] arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and functions Atish Patra 2019-05-29 15:10 ` Sudeep Holla 2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 5/5] RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot Atish Patra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=b291e1da-47a7-32b9-ab36-90f65b2a961a@wdc.com \ --to=atish.patra@wdc.com \ --cc=anup@brainfault.org \ --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \ --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=ottosabart@seberm.com \ --cc=palmer@sifive.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=schwab@suse.de \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).