LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
To: Rob Herring <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:57:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180427142144.tvy5xamuwz6jnxk5@rob-hp-laptop>

On 2018-04-27 07:21, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 04:09:31PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
>> Documentation for last level cache controller device tree bindings,
>> client bindings usage examples.
>> Signed-off-by: Channagoud Kadabi <>
>> Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.txt      | 60 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.txt
> My comments on v4 still apply.
> Rob

Hi Rob,
Reposting our replies to your comments on v4:

This is partially true, a bunch of SoCs would support this design but
clients IDs are not expected to change. So Ideally client drivers could
hard code these IDs.

However I have other concerns of moving the client Ids in the driver.
The way the APIs implemented today are as follows:
#1. Client calls into system cache driver to get cache slice handle
with the usecase Id as input.
#2. System cache driver gets the phandle of system cache instance from
the client device to obtain the private data.
#3. Based on the usecase Id perform look up in the private data to get
cache slice handle.
#4. Return the cache slice handle to client

If we don't have the connection between client & system cache then the
  private data needs to declared as static global in the system cache 
that limits us to have just once instance of system cache block.

Please let us know what you think.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-27 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-23 23:09 [PATCH v5 0/2] SDM845 System Cache Driver Rishabh Bhatnagar
2018-04-23 23:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc Rishabh Bhatnagar
2018-04-27 14:21   ` Rob Herring
2018-04-27 22:57     ` rishabhb [this message]
2018-04-30 14:33       ` Rob Herring
2018-05-01  0:37         ` rishabhb
2018-05-08 15:35           ` Rob Herring
2018-04-23 23:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] drivers: soc: Add LLCC driver Rishabh Bhatnagar
2018-04-24  3:25   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-26 18:32   ` Evan Green

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).