LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: overlay: Stop leaking resources on overlay removal
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:20:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb034d02-6bff-6828-bbf6-021bf4d39a95@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8704374-857c-d80e-e91c-89d59e1cffbe@siemens.com>

On 04/26/18 04:00, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Only the overlay notifier callbacks have a chance to potentially get
> hold of references to those two resources, but they are not supposed to
> store them beyond OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE.
> 
> Document the overlay notifier API, its constraint regarding pointer
> lifetime, and then remove intentional leaks of ovcs->overlay_tree and
> ovcs->fdt from free_overlay_changeset.
> 
> See also https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/1063 and following.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt |  8 ++++++++
>  drivers/of/overlay.c                       | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
> index a4feb6dde8cd..725fb8d255c1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
> @@ -98,6 +98,14 @@ Finally, if you need to remove all overlays in one-go, just call
>  of_overlay_remove_all() which will remove every single one in the correct
>  order.
>  
> +In addition, there is the option to register notifiers that get called on
> +overlay operations. See of_overlay_notifier_register/unregister and
> +enum of_overlay_notify_action for details.
> +
> +Note that a notifier callback is not supposed to store pointers to a device
> +tree node or its content beyond OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE corresponding to the
> +respective node it received.
> +
>  Overlay DTS Format
>  ------------------
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> index b35fe88f1851..7baa53e5b1d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> @@ -102,12 +102,28 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(ovcs_idr);
>  
>  static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(overlay_notify_chain);
>  
> +/**
> + * of_overlay_notifier_register() - Register notifier for overlay operations
> + * @nb:		Notifier block to register
> + *
> + * Register for notification on overlay operations on device tree nodes. The
> + * reported actions definied by @of_reconfig_change. The notifier callback
> + * furthermore receives a pointer to the affected device tree node.
> + *
> + * Note that a notifier callback is not supposed to store pointers to a device
> + * tree node or its content beyond @OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE corresponding to the
> + * respective node it received.
> + */
>  int of_overlay_notifier_register(struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
>  	return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&overlay_notify_chain, nb);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_overlay_notifier_register);
>  
> +/**
> + * of_overlay_notifier_register() - Unregister notifier for overlay operations
> + * @nb:		Notifier block to unregister
> + */
>  int of_overlay_notifier_unregister(struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
>  	return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&overlay_notify_chain, nb);
> @@ -671,17 +687,13 @@ static void free_overlay_changeset(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs)
>  		of_node_put(ovcs->fragments[i].overlay);
>  	}
>  	kfree(ovcs->fragments);
> -
>  	/*
> -	 * TODO
> -	 *
> -	 * would like to: kfree(ovcs->overlay_tree);
> -	 * but can not since drivers may have pointers into this data
> -	 *
> -	 * would like to: kfree(ovcs->fdt);
> -	 * but can not since drivers may have pointers into this data
> +	 * There should be no live pointers into ovcs->overlay_tree and
> +	 * ovcs->fdt due to the policy that overlay notifiers are not allowed
> +	 * to retain pointers into the overlay devicetree.
>  	 */
> -
> +	kfree(ovcs->overlay_tree);
> +	kfree(ovcs->fdt);
>  	kfree(ovcs);
>  }
>  
> 

These added kfree()s are depending on good review of overlay notifier
patches to prevent retaining pointers into this freed memory.  When
this patch is accepted I will submit a patch to add a "K:" pattern
line to the Overlay MAINTAINERS entry to catch when overlay notifiers
are added.

Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-26 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-26 11:00 Jan Kiszka
2018-04-26 20:20 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2018-04-27  2:19 ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb034d02-6bff-6828-bbf6-021bf4d39a95@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2] of: overlay: Stop leaking resources on overlay removal' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).