LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Add microcode container data checking functions
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 00:27:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4a49546-a4bb-c7a5-116a-be537bacb688@maciej.szmigiero.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180430090447.GA6509@pd.tnic>
On 30.04.2018 11:04, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:34:07PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
>> +/*
>> + * Checks whether there is a valid, non-truncated CPU equivalence table
>> + * at the beginning of a passed buffer @buf of size @size.
>> + * If @early is set this function does not print errors which makes it
>> + * usable by the early microcode loader.
>> + */
>> +static bool verify_equivalence_table(const u8 *buf, size_t buf_size, bool early)
>> +{
>> + const u32 *hdr = (const u32 *)buf;
>> + u32 cont_type, equiv_tbl_len;
>> +
>> + cont_type = hdr[1];
>
> You need to check the size of buf so that there's enough buf passed in
> before you index into it like that.
These checking functions are supposed to be called in order:
first verify_container() verifies the basic container, then
verify_equivalence_table() verifies the equivalence table while not
repeating the checks that were already done by the former function.
>> + if (cont_type != UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE) {
>> + if (!early)
>> + pr_err("Wrong microcode container equivalence table type: %u.\n",
>> + cont_type);
>> +
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + equiv_tbl_len = hdr[2];
>
> And that.
Same situation here.
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Checks whether a microcode patch located at the beginning of a passed
>> + * buffer @buf of size @size is not too large for a particular @family
>> + * and is not truncated.
>> + * If @early is set this function does not print errors which makes it
>> + * usable by the early microcode loader.
>> + */
>> +static bool verify_patch(u8 family, const u8 *buf, size_t buf_size, bool early)
>> +{
>> + const u32 *hdr = (const u32 *)buf;
>> + u32 patch_size = hdr[1];
>
> Just like in the first comment above.
>
And a similar situation here - verify_patch() does not verify things
that were already checked by verify_container() or
verify_patch_section().
Thanks,
Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-23 21:34 [PATCH v5 0/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Check microcode file sanity before loading it Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-04-23 21:34 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Subtract SECTION_HDR_SIZE from file leftover length Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-04-23 21:34 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Add microcode container data checking functions Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-04-30 9:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-30 22:27 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero [this message]
2018-05-01 8:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-05-01 16:19 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-04-23 21:34 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Check microcode container data in the early loader Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-04-30 9:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-30 22:27 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-05-01 8:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-23 21:34 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Check microcode container data in the late loader Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-04-30 9:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-30 22:27 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-05-01 8:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-05-01 16:19 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-05-01 20:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-05-02 0:47 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-05-03 10:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-05-03 23:26 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-05-07 16:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-23 21:34 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Add a reminder about PATCH_MAX_SIZE macro Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-04-23 21:34 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Check the equivalence table size when scanning it Maciej S. Szmigiero
2018-04-30 9:05 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4a49546-a4bb-c7a5-116a-be537bacb688@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--to=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Add microcode container data checking functions' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).