LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
dyoung@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, bhsharma@redhat.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/11] arm64: kexec_file: allow for loading Image-format kernel
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 18:46:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c604b578-6667-3532-eac9-55c428001025@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180425062629.29404-7-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Hi Akashi,
On 25/04/18 07:26, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> This patch provides kexec_file_ops for "Image"-format kernel. In this
> implementation, a binary is always loaded with a fixed offset identified
> in text_offset field of its header.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> index e4de1223715f..3cba4161818a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -102,6 +102,56 @@ struct kimage_arch {
> void *dtb_buf;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct arm64_image_header - arm64 kernel image header
> + *
> + * @pe_sig: Optional PE format 'MZ' signature
> + * @branch_code: Instruction to branch to stext
> + * @text_offset: Image load offset, little endian
> + * @image_size: Effective image size, little endian
> + * @flags:
> + * Bit 0: Kernel endianness. 0=little endian, 1=big endian
Page size? What about 'phys_base'?, (whatever that is...)
Probably best to refer to Documentation/arm64/booting.txt here, its the
authoritative source of what these fields mean.
> + * @reserved: Reserved
> + * @magic: Magic number, "ARM\x64"
> + * @pe_header: Optional offset to a PE format header
> + **/
> +
> +struct arm64_image_header {
> + u8 pe_sig[2];
> + u8 pad[2];
> + u32 branch_code;
> + u64 text_offset;
> + u64 image_size;
> + u64 flags;
__le64 as appropriate here would let tools like sparse catch any missing endian
conversion bugs.
> + u64 reserved[3];
> + u8 magic[4];
> + u32 pe_header;
> +};
I'm surprised we don't have a definition for this already, I guess its always
done in asm. We have kernel/image.h that holds some of this stuff, if we are
going to validate the flags, is it worth adding the code there, (and moving it
to include/asm)?
> +static const u8 arm64_image_magic[4] = {'A', 'R', 'M', 0x64U};
Any chance this magic could be a pre-processor symbol shared with head.S?
> +
> +/**
> + * arm64_header_check_magic - Helper to check the arm64 image header.
> + *
> + * Returns non-zero if header is OK.
> + */
> +
> +static inline int arm64_header_check_magic(const struct arm64_image_header *h)
> +{
> + if (!h)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!h->text_offset)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return (h->magic[0] == arm64_image_magic[0]
> + && h->magic[1] == arm64_image_magic[1]
> + && h->magic[2] == arm64_image_magic[2]
> + && h->magic[3] == arm64_image_magic[3]);
memcmp()? Or just define it as a 32bit value?
I guess you skip the MZ prefix as its not present for !EFI?
Could we check branch_code is non-zero, and text-offset points within image-size?
We could check that this platform supports the page-size/endian config that this
Image was built with... We get a message from the EFI stub if the page-size
can't be supported, it would be nice to do the same here (as we can).
(no idea if kexec-tool checks this stuff, it probably can't get at the id
registers to know)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4dd524ad6611
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +static void *image_load(struct kimage *image,
> + char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len,
> + char *initrd, unsigned long initrd_len,
> + char *cmdline, unsigned long cmdline_len)
> +{
> + struct kexec_buf kbuf;
> + struct arm64_image_header *h = (struct arm64_image_header *)kernel;
> + unsigned long text_offset;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Load the kernel */
> + kbuf.image = image;
> + kbuf.buf_min = 0;
> + kbuf.buf_max = ULONG_MAX;
> + kbuf.top_down = false;
> +
> + kbuf.buffer = kernel;
> + kbuf.bufsz = kernel_len;
> + kbuf.memsz = le64_to_cpu(h->image_size);
> + text_offset = le64_to_cpu(h->text_offset);
> + kbuf.buf_align = SZ_2M;
> + /* Adjust kernel segment with TEXT_OFFSET */
> + kbuf.memsz += text_offset;
> +
> + ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + image->arch.kern_segment = image->nr_segments - 1;
You only seem to use kern_segment here, and in load_other_segments() called
below. Could it not be a local variable passed in? Instead of arch-specific data
we keep forever?
> + image->segment[image->arch.kern_segment].mem += text_offset;
> + image->segment[image->arch.kern_segment].memsz -= text_offset;
> + image->start = image->segment[image->arch.kern_segment].mem;
> +
> + pr_debug("Loaded kernel at 0x%lx bufsz=0x%lx memsz=0x%lx\n",
> + image->segment[image->arch.kern_segment].mem,
> + kbuf.bufsz, kbuf.memsz);
> +
> + /* Load additional data */
> + ret = load_other_segments(image, initrd, initrd_len,
> + cmdline, cmdline_len);
> +
> +out:
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
Looks good,
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-01 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 6:26 [PATCH v9 00/11] arm64: kexec: add kexec_file_load() support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] asm-generic: add kexec_file_load system call to unistd.h AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] kexec_file: make kexec_image_post_load_cleanup_default() global AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-28 9:45 ` Dave Young
2018-05-01 17:46 ` James Morse
2018-05-07 4:40 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] arm64: kexec_file: invoke the kernel without purgatory AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-01 17:46 ` James Morse
2018-05-07 5:22 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-11 17:03 ` James Morse
2018-05-15 4:45 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 16:15 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 6:22 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] arm64: kexec_file: allocate memory walking through memblock list AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-01 17:46 ` James Morse
2018-05-07 5:59 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 4:35 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 16:17 ` James Morse
2018-05-17 2:10 ` Baoquan He
2018-05-17 2:15 ` Baoquan He
2018-05-17 18:04 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 1:37 ` Baoquan He
2018-05-18 5:07 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] arm64: kexec_file: load initrd and device-tree AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 16:20 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 7:11 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-18 7:42 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-18 15:59 ` James Morse
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] arm64: kexec_file: allow for loading Image-format kernel AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-01 17:46 ` James Morse [this message]
2018-05-07 7:21 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-11 17:07 ` James Morse
2018-05-15 5:13 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 17:14 ` James Morse
2018-05-21 9:32 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] arm64: kexec_file: add crash dump support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 17:11 ` James Morse
2018-05-16 8:34 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 9:58 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-16 10:06 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 9:50 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-18 10:39 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-18 16:00 ` James Morse
2018-05-21 9:46 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 17:12 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 15:35 ` Rob Herring
2018-05-21 10:14 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-24 14:25 ` Rob Herring
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] arm64: enable KEXEC_FILE config AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] include: pe.h: remove message[] from mz header definition AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] arm64: kexec_file: add kernel signature verification support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] arm64: kexec_file: add kaslr support AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c604b578-6667-3532-eac9-55c428001025@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v9 06/11] arm64: kexec_file: allow for loading Image-format kernel' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).