From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755219AbYKCNcd (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:32:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755292AbYKCNcN (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:32:13 -0500 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.26]:55525 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755260AbYKCNcM (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:32:12 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=NXD00iamzeeujEEBxlrMzn5RKRL6+1qXT21xc8rotIsceOxHzY4WM32hADjS3SP3vU AMrKsnT6nKV4MdY5IJMlpHzfC/WouhglEk5rsI0ncrj2KUvX678KAUlpvoOSJvfGnyf9 LsiRvPtH+9G2O187sRn//GZx9Qf2mO+YEdyQg= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:32:10 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Weisbecker?=" To: ananth@in.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make ftrace able to trace function return Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Steven Rostedt" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Weisbecker_=3Cfweisbec=40gmail=2Ecom=3E?=@thinktux.in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jim Keniston" In-Reply-To: <20081103111602.GA7515@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <490A08E3.2040201@gmail.com> <20081030182056.GA14102@elte.hu> <20081030183714.GA17822@elte.hu> <20081030192621.GF27407@elte.hu> <20081103111602.GA7515@in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2008/11/3 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli : > There were other issues encountered during its implementation (some > of them 'cos we hash instances on the task) were with routines that are > entered/exited in different task contexts, noret type functions, etc. I think I have some problems related to noret type functions too. That's interesting, I will read your implementation....