LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: THOBY Simon <Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr>
To: liqiong <liqiong@nfschina.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com" <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock within RCU list of ima_rules
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 07:30:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <caa4955e-04d9-d3f8-cccb-5f78bd554c55@viveris.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd52af5b-6c69-73a1-e0b2-8d23f3d8db3a@nfschina.com>
Hi liqiong,
a few nits but nothing significant. This is getting in good shape!
On 8/27/21 8:41 AM, liqiong wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thanks for you help, i may got it, here is the new commit message:
>
>
> The current IMA ruleset is identified by the variable "ima_rules"
> that default to "&ima_default_rules". When loading a custom policy
> for the first time, the variable is updated to "&ima_policy_rules"
> instead. That update isn't RCU-safe, and deadlocks are possible.
> Because some functions like ima_match_policy() may loop indefinitely
s/Because/Indeed,/ (in english, sentences with a subordinating conjunction
like 'because' are usually written in two parts, and a dependent clause
standing by itself is rarely used except for stylistic effect)
> over traversing the "ima_default_rules" as list_for_each_entry_rcu().
s/over traversing the "ima_default_rules" as list_for_each_entry_rcu()/when traversing "ima_default_rules" with list_for_each_entry_rcu()./
>
> When iterating over the default ruleset back to head, value of
> "&entry->list" is "&ima_default_rules", and "ima_rules" may have been
s/value of "&entry->list" is "&ima_default_rules"/if the list head is "ima_default_rules"/
s/may have been/have been/
> updated to "&ima_policy_rules", the loop condition (&entry->list != ima_rules)
> stay alway true, traversing doesn't terminate, cause soft lockup and
Don't forget the 's' in "stays" (or "remains")
Ditto for "always"
s/traversing doesn't/traversing won't/
Also: s/cause/causing a/
> RCU stalls.
>
> Introduce a temporary value for "ima_rules" when iterating over
> the ruleset to avoid the deadlocks.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: liqiong <liqiong@nfschina.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index fd5d46e511f1..e92b197bfd3c 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
>
>
> Thanks
>
> liqiong
>
Thanks,
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-27 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-19 10:15 [PATCH] ima: fix infinite loop within "ima_match_policy" function liqiong
2021-08-19 12:58 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-19 13:47 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-19 19:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-20 10:15 ` 李力琼
2021-08-20 13:23 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-20 15:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-23 3:04 ` 李力琼
2021-08-23 7:51 ` 李力琼
2021-08-23 8:06 ` liqiong
2021-08-23 8:14 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-23 11:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-23 12:02 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-23 12:09 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-23 12:56 ` liqiong
2021-08-23 11:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-20 17:53 ` liqiong
2021-08-23 7:13 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-24 8:57 ` [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock " liqiong
2021-08-24 9:50 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-24 12:09 ` liqiong
2021-08-24 12:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-08-25 7:05 ` [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock within RCU list of ima_rules liqiong
2021-08-25 11:45 ` liqiong
2021-08-25 12:03 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-26 8:15 ` liqiong
2021-08-26 9:01 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-27 6:41 ` liqiong
2021-08-27 7:30 ` THOBY Simon [this message]
2021-08-27 9:10 ` liqiong
2021-08-27 9:20 ` THOBY Simon
2021-08-27 10:35 ` [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock when traversing "ima_default_rules" liqiong
2021-08-27 16:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-09-18 3:11 ` liqiong
2021-09-30 19:46 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-10-09 10:38 ` liqiong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=caa4955e-04d9-d3f8-cccb-5f78bd554c55@viveris.fr \
--to=simon.thoby@viveris.fr \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqiong@nfschina.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock within RCU list of ima_rules' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).