LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, "Jeremy Kerr" <jk@ozlabs.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCHED_IDLE documentation
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:06:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0803030606v7ba30121k19f2e90c595451d8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080303125227.GA22160@elte.hu>

Ingo,

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>  * Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > > * What's the difference between SCHED_IDLE and SCHED_BATCH?
>  > >
>  > > SCHED_BATCH can still have nice levels from -20 to +19, it is a
>  > > modified SCHED_OTHER/SCHED_NORMAL for "throughput oriented"
>  > > workloads.
>  >
>  > So, suppose we have two CPU intensive jobs, one SCHED_OTHER and the
>  > other SCHED_BATCH.  If they have the same nice value, will/should the
>  > scheduler favour one over the other?
>
>  yes - SCHED_BATCH does not modify the CPU usage proportion for
>  CPU-intense tasks, it's their nice value that controls the proportion.
>  What it will influence is wakeup behavior - i.e. wakeup-intense
>  workloads should schedule less with SCHED_BATCH. (but how that is done
>  is really fluid and will probably tweaked in the future.)
>
>         Ingo

So, I've tweaked the description of SCHED_BATCH in the
sched_setscheduler.2 man page, and added some text describing
SCHED_IDLE.  Relevant excepts below.  Does his look okay to you?

       SCHED_OTHER is the default universal time-sharing  sched-
       uler  policy  used  by  most  processes.   SCHED_BATCH is
       intended  for  "batch"  style  execution  of   processes.
       SCHED_IDLE  is  intended  for  running  very low priority
       background jobs.  SCHED_FIFO and  SCHED_RR  are  intended
       for  special time-critical applications that need precise
       control over the way  in  which  runnable  processes  are
       selected for execution.

       Processes  scheduled  with  SCHED_OTHER,  SCHED_BATCH, or
       SCHED_IDLE must be assigned the static priority 0.   Pro-
       cesses  scheduled under SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR can have a
       static priority in the range 1 to 99.
       ...

   SCHED_BATCH: Scheduling batch processes
       (Since Linux 2.6.16.)  SCHED_BATCH can only  be  used  at
       static   priority   0.    This   policy   is  similar  to
       SCHED_OTHER, except that it will cause the  scheduler  to
       always  assume that the process is CPU-intensive.  Conse-
       quently, the scheduler  will  apply  a  small  scheduling
       penalty  with  respect  to wakeup behaviour, so that this
       process is mildly  disfavored  in  scheduling  decisions.
       This policy is useful for workloads that are non-interac-
       tive, but do not want to lower their nice value, and  for
       workloads  that  want  a  deterministic scheduling policy
       without interactivity causing extra preemptions  (between
       the workload's tasks).

   SCHED_IDLE: Scheduling very low priority jobs
       (Since  Linux  2.6.23.)   SCHED_IDLE  can only be used at
       static priority 0; the process nice value has  no  influ-
       ence  for  this policy.  This policy is intended for run-
       ning jobs at extremely low priority (lower  even  than  a
       +19  nice value with the SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH poli-
       cies).

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Maintainer of the Linux man-pages project
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Want to report a man-pages bug?  Look here:
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-03 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1203376368.275756.252634247263.1.gpush@pokey>
     [not found] ` <200803030612.28039.arnd@arndb.de>
     [not found]   ` <20080303051719.GA26102@lst.de>
2008-03-03  6:21     ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-03-03  7:33       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03  8:40         ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-03  9:24           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03  9:31             ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-03-03 10:03               ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-03 10:04               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 10:12                 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-03 10:07             ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-03 10:17               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 10:20                 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-03 12:31             ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-03 12:52               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 14:06                 ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2008-03-04 11:11                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-05 15:19                     ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-03 14:42                 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-03-05 15:02                   ` Michael Kerrisk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cfd18e0f0803030606v7ba30121k19f2e90c595451d8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --subject='Re: SCHED_IDLE documentation' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).