LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<julien.massot@iot.bzh>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/12] rpmsg: char: Introduce the "rpmsg-raw" channel
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 17:43:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7504c4c-ad9d-1124-6338-6da78aec9852@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yal4XcCVa6GAQYkG@builder.lan>
On 12/3/21 2:52 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 08 Nov 08:19 CST 2021, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>
>> Allows to probe the endpoint device on a remote name service announcement,
>> by registering a rpmsg_driverfor the "rpmsg-raw" channel.
>>
>> With this patch the /dev/rpmsgX interface can be instantiated by the remote
>> firmware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c | 7 +++--
>> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> index 6a01e8e1c111..dd754c870ba1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> @@ -432,6 +432,58 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create);
>>
>> +static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>> +{
>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
>> + struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
>> + struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
>> +
>> + memcpy(chinfo.name, rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
>> + chinfo.src = rpdev->src;
>> + chinfo.dst = rpdev->dst;
>> +
>> + eptdev = rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc(rpdev, dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(eptdev))
>> + return PTR_ERR(eptdev);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Create the default endpoint associated to the rpmsg device and provide rpmsg_eptdev
>> + * structure as callback private data.
>> + * Do not allow the creation and release of an endpoint on /dev/rpmsgX open and close,
>> + * reuse the default endpoint instead
>> + */
>> + eptdev->default_ept = rpmsg_create_default_ept(rpdev, rpmsg_ept_cb, eptdev, chinfo);
>> + if (!eptdev->default_ept) {
>> + dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "failed to create %s\n", chinfo.name);
>> + put_device(dev);
>
> Which get_device() does this correlate to?
this is related to device_initialize [1]( and herited from the legacy
implementation of rpmsg_char)
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.16-rc3/source/drivers/base/core.c#L2860
>
>> + kfree(eptdev);
>
> After the device_initialize() in rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_alloc() you're
> supposed to put_device() &eptdev->dev, which would kfree(eptdev)...
dev->release is set only in rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add. and calling
rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add at this level would need to handle the free of some
uninitialized parameters.
That why I directly free it here.
>
>
> Note though that rpmsg_eptdev_release_device() calls cdev_del(), which
> you can't do. It was however recently reported that this cdev_del()
> should be done in conjunction with the device_del() as the current
> implementation enables a race between release and fops->open.
I'm not sure to understand your point here. Is it related to your previous
comment concerning the use of put_device or do you expect something from me
specific in the around device_del and cdev_del?
Thanks,
Arnaud
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_add(eptdev, chinfo);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rpmsg_chrdev_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = device_for_each_child(&rpdev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(&rpdev->dev, "failed to destroy endpoints: %d\n", ret);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct rpmsg_device_id rpmsg_chrdev_id_table[] = {
>> + { .name = "rpmsg-raw" },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct rpmsg_driver rpmsg_chrdev_driver = {
>> + .probe = rpmsg_chrdev_probe,
>> + .remove = rpmsg_chrdev_remove,
>> + .id_table = rpmsg_chrdev_id_table,
>> + .drv.name = "rpmsg_chrdev",
>> +};
>> +
>> static int rpmsg_chrdev_init(void)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> @@ -442,12 +494,24 @@ static int rpmsg_chrdev_init(void)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + ret = register_rpmsg_driver(&rpmsg_chrdev_driver);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + pr_err("rpmsg: failed to register rpmsg raw driver\n");
>> + goto free_region;
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +free_region:
>> + unregister_chrdev_region(rpmsg_major, RPMSG_DEV_MAX);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> postcore_initcall(rpmsg_chrdev_init);
>>
>> static void rpmsg_chrdev_exit(void)
>> {
>> + unregister_rpmsg_driver(&rpmsg_chrdev_driver);
>> unregister_chrdev_region(rpmsg_major, RPMSG_DEV_MAX);
>> }
>> module_exit(rpmsg_chrdev_exit);
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c
>> index 59d2bd264fdb..298e75dc7774 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
>> * Based on rpmsg performance statistics driver by Michal Simek, which in turn
>> * was based on TI & Google OMX rpmsg driver.
>> */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>> +
>> #include <linux/cdev.h>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/fs.h>
>> @@ -193,13 +196,13 @@ static int rpmsg_ctrldev_init(void)
>>
>> ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&rpmsg_major, 0, RPMSG_DEV_MAX, "rpmsg_ctrl");
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - pr_err("rpmsg: failed to allocate char dev region\n");
>> + pr_err("failed to allocate char dev region\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> ret = register_rpmsg_driver(&rpmsg_ctrldev_driver);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - pr_err("rpmsg ctrl: failed to register rpmsg driver\n");
>> + pr_err("failed to register rpmsg driver\n");
>> unregister_chrdev_region(rpmsg_major, RPMSG_DEV_MAX);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-08 14:19 [PATCH v7 00/12] Restructure the rpmsg_char driver and introduce rpmsg_ctrl driver Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] rpmsg: char: Export eptdev create an destroy functions Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-12-03 2:17 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-03 16:37 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-12-03 16:41 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] rpmsg: Create the rpmsg class in core instead of in rpmsg char Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-12-03 2:17 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] rpmsg: Move the rpmsg control device from rpmsg_char to rpmsg_ctrl Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-12-03 2:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] ARM: configs: Configs that had RPMSG_CHAR now gets RPMSG_CTRL Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] RISCV: " Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] rpmsg: Update rpmsg_chrdev_register_device function Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] rpmsg: char: Refactor rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create function Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] rpmsg: Introduce rpmsg_create_default_ept function Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] rpmsg: char: Add possibility to use default endpoint of the rpmsg device Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-12-03 2:32 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] rpmsg: char: Introduce the "rpmsg-raw" channel Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-12-03 1:52 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-03 16:43 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] rpmsg: ctrl: Introduce new RPMSG_CREATE/RELEASE_DEV_IOCTL controls Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-11-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] rpmsg: core: send a ns announcement when a default endpoint is created Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-12-03 1:58 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-03 16:56 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7504c4c-ad9d-1124-6338-6da78aec9852@foss.st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=julien.massot@iot.bzh \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v7 10/12] rpmsg: char: Introduce the "rpmsg-raw" channel' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).