LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	ying.huang@intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	josef@toxicpanda.com, hughd@google.com, shakeelb@google.com,
	hdanton@sina.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v7 PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: remove double slab pressure by inc'ing sc->nr_scanned
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:12:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d99fbe8f-9c80-d407-e848-0be00e3b8886@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560202615.3312.6.camel@suse.de>



On 6/10/19 2:36 PM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 14:44 +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> The commit 9092c71bb724 ("mm: use sc->priority for slab shrink
>> targets")
>> has broken up the relationship between sc->nr_scanned and slab
>> pressure.
>> The sc->nr_scanned can't double slab pressure anymore.  So, it sounds
>> no
>> sense to still keep sc->nr_scanned inc'ed.  Actually, it would
>> prevent
>> from adding pressure on slab shrink since excessive sc->nr_scanned
>> would
>> prevent from scan->priority raise.
> Hi Yang,
>
> I might be misunderstanding this, but did you mean "prevent from scan-
> priority decreasing"?
> I guess we are talking about balance_pgdat(), and in case
> kswapd_shrink_node() returns true (it means we have scanned more than
> we had to reclaim), raise_priority becomes false, and this does not let
> sc->priority to be decreased, which has the impact that less pages will
>   be reclaimed the next round.

Yes, exactly.

>
> Sorry for bugging here, I just wanted to see if I got this right.
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-28  6:44 Yang Shi
2019-05-28  6:44 ` [v7 PATCH 2/2] mm: vmscan: correct some vmscan counters for THP swapout Yang Shi
2019-05-29  0:57   ` Huang, Ying
2019-06-10 21:36 ` [v7 PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: remove double slab pressure by inc'ing sc->nr_scanned Oscar Salvador
2019-06-11 17:12   ` Yang Shi [this message]
2019-06-11 17:17     ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d99fbe8f-9c80-d407-e848-0be00e3b8886@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [v7 PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: remove double slab pressure by inc'\''ing sc->nr_scanned' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).