LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] bitops: Add single_bit_set()
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:18:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2675600-7b04-19b0-79ce-28a4e1d1f225@fi.rohmeurope.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZuTt3+PPvyJsFQ/@smile.fi.intel.com>
On 11/22/21 14:57, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:42:21PM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
>> On 11/22/21 13:28, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:03:25PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>
> What do you mean by this?
>
> hweight() will return you the number of the non-zero elements in the set.
Exactly. The function I added did only check if given set of bits had
only one bit set.
> In application to boolean based arrays it means the number of bits that
> are set. Obviously, the condition `hweight() == 1` is what you are looking
> for.
Yes. (hweight() == 1) will result exactly same result - which does not
mean the single_bit_set() was same as hweight(). Say, we have a 32bit
wide value, which is likely to be '11' (binary). The single_bit_set()
would return 0 after checking the 2.nd bit. So, this is not equal to
hamming weight. But as I said, none of this is really needed for my
use-case and does not warrant adding new function.
>> I think I actually tried using hweight() at some point but don't really
>> remember why I rolled the single_bit_set. (I remember the hweight()
>> usage because I had to do some googling as I had never heard term
>> hamming weight before).
>
> Oh, it should be a very good reason not to use hweight() since on some
> architectures it might become just one assembly instruction.
I didn't know of this. Thanks for sharing.
> (Side note: all your sentences but last in all of the paragraphs are ending
> with trailing space. For example, "series " and "thanks." for the comparison
> in the previous paragraph. Can you fix this, please?)
I changed from evolution to Thunderbird when my old laptop broke. It
seems Thunderbird is doing this by default, don't know if it can be
changed :( I'll see if I find a solution.
Best Regards
--Matti
--
The Linux Kernel guy at ROHM Semiconductors
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND
~~ this year is the year of a signature writers block ~~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-22 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 11:03 [PATCH 0/4] Provide event map helper for regulator drivers Matti Vaittinen
2021-11-22 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] bitops: Add single_bit_set() Matti Vaittinen
2021-11-22 11:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-22 12:42 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2021-11-22 12:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-22 13:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-22 13:18 ` Vaittinen, Matti [this message]
2021-11-23 10:42 ` David Laight
2021-11-23 10:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-23 10:58 ` David Laight
2021-11-23 13:43 ` 'Andy Shevchenko'
2021-11-23 14:36 ` David Laight
2021-11-23 11:42 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2021-11-22 17:54 ` Yury Norov
2021-11-22 19:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-23 7:51 ` Yury Norov
2021-11-23 5:26 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2021-11-23 7:33 ` Yury Norov
2021-11-23 9:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-23 9:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-22 11:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] regulators: Add regulator_err2notif() helper Matti Vaittinen
2021-11-22 11:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] regulators: irq_helper: Provide helper for trivial IRQ notifications Matti Vaittinen
2021-11-22 11:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-22 12:44 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2021-11-22 11:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] regulator: Drop unnecessary struct member Matti Vaittinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2675600-7b04-19b0-79ce-28a4e1d1f225@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--to=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/4] bitops: Add single_bit_set()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).