Re: [PATCH][RESEND] C99 initializers for DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE()

["Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>]

Could someone please be so kind to ACK the patch below, NAK it or tell
me whether I should send the patch below to someone else ?

Thanks,

Bart.

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Bart Van Assche
<bart.vanassche@gmail.com> wrote:
> A few months ago (July 25, 2008) the printk ratelimiting code has been
> rewritten. This patch added a.o. the new macro DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(). The
> patch below converts the initializers in that macro to C99 style.
>
> For more information about the printk ratelimiting rewrite, see also commit
> 717115e1a5856b57af0f71e1df7149108294fc10
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.27.y.git;a=commit;h=717115e1a5856b57af0f71e1df7149108294fc10).
>
> Impact: cleanup, no functionality changed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ratelimit.h b/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> index 18a5b9b..61cc908 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ratelimit.h
> @@ -13,8 +13,9 @@ struct ratelimit_state {
>        unsigned long begin;
>  };
>
> -#define DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(name, interval, burst)          \
> -               struct ratelimit_state name = {interval, burst,}
> +#define DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(name, interval_value, burst_value)      \
> +       struct ratelimit_state name =                                   \
> +               { .interval = (interval_value), .burst = (burst_value) }
>
>  extern int __ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs);
>