From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0CAC43144 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1997E23F1F for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="XKRQ/8gb"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="ASpIVLhe" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1997E23F1F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933830AbeF0IzQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 04:55:16 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:36080 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932549AbeF0IzO (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 04:55:14 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6AE0A60714; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:55:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1530089713; bh=MxPdJySkh5aY27mksr7L8pDUA+FaR2Y+fpE8Or0fdt0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XKRQ/8gbKtF+eDurXEEPzuDKs5eJSe+CQ5VbONM2bHPL5cDWrEK+0VsOw6KWDlr3L gXhsKiCjtD8FdgXKuN6l7gcp5rJStY/m+6VxEyV44Tjc+8Cfvb+uavNUKuAtMXEcYo 5ku6RePPXdfh73EGG3lKUDhdBZp6suzEu6LXoE8M= Received: from [10.79.40.88] (blr-bdr-fw-01_globalnat_allzones-outside.qualcomm.com [103.229.18.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rnayak@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EA116024C; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:55:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1530089712; bh=MxPdJySkh5aY27mksr7L8pDUA+FaR2Y+fpE8Or0fdt0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ASpIVLhe6z67WwAKPCeshzs5xQPA3aGLQQuC6pV6kfBQEqw7tQygHD5zmm+f7o70G uQxvIVO55bg20XFb7NPw+JGMznL+wBpUXubhF+j0PVrI0+h2d17te8l5mkpSkWA7O/ F6KDc60cyhdwx9taCXcpQpluEWa51QhP9S7JBfYM= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7EA116024C Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rnayak@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] PM / Domains: Add dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id() to manage multi PM domains To: Jon Hunter , Ulf Hansson Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux PM , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kevin Hilman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Todor Tomov , Viresh Kumar , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , Linux ARM References: <20180529100421.31022-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20180529100421.31022-10-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> From: Rajendra Nayak Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:25:07 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/30/2018 08:00 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> My only other comments on this series are ... >>> >>> 1. I think it would be nice to have an dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and >>> that the DT binding has a 'power-domain-names' property. >> I think it makes sense, but my plan was to do that as second step on >> top. Are you okay with that as well? > Yes that is fine with me. Ulf, do you have a patch for this? I am working on moving some of qcom remoteproc drivers to use this series and it will help to have a dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() api. Thanks, Rajendra -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation