LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Lumpy Reclaim V4 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:33:51 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <exportbomb.1172604830@kernel> (raw) Following this email are five patches which represent the current state of the lumpy reclaim patches; collectivly lumpy v4. This patch kit is designed as a complete drop-in replacement for the lumpy patches in 2.6.20-mm2. This stack is split out to show the incremental changes in this version. Andrew please replace your current lumpy stack with this one, you may prefer to fold this kit into a single patch lumpy-v4. Comparitive testing between lumpy-v3 and lump-v4 generally shows a small improvement, coming from the improved matching of pages taken from the end of the active/inactive list (patch 2 in this series). I have taken the lumpy-v2 patches and fixes as found in 2.6.20-rc6-mm2 and folded them back into a single patch (collectivly lumpy v3), updating attribution. On top of this are are four patches which represent the updates mainly coming from the detailed review comments from Andrew Morton: lumpy-reclaim-v3: folded back base, lumpy-v3, lumpy-isolate_lru_pages-wants-to-specifically-take-active-or-inactive-pages: ensure we take pages of the expected type from the end of the active/ inactive lists. This is both a performance and correctness fix, lumpy-ensure-that-we-compare-PageActive-and-active-safely: ensure comparisons between PageActive() and coded booleans are safe should PageActive() not return 1/0, lumpy-update-commentry-on-subtle-comparisons-and-rounding-assumptions: update the code commentary to explain the subtle exit conditions, and lumpy-only-check-for-valid-pages-when-holes-are-present: remove expensive check for invalid pages within MAX_ORDER blocks where those cannot exist. Against: 2.6.20-mm2 -apw
next reply other threads:[~2007-02-27 19:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-02-27 19:33 Andy Whitcroft [this message] 2007-02-27 19:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] Lumpy Reclaim V3 Andy Whitcroft 2007-02-28 18:14 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-03-02 15:45 ` Andy Whitcroft 2007-02-27 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] lumpy: isolate_lru_pages wants to specifically take active or inactive pages Andy Whitcroft 2007-02-28 18:17 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-03-02 15:57 ` Andy Whitcroft 2007-02-27 19:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] lumpy: ensure that we compare PageActive and active safely Andy Whitcroft 2007-02-27 19:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] lumpy: update commentry on subtle comparisons and rounding assumptions Andy Whitcroft 2007-02-27 19:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] lumpy: only check for valid pages when holes are present Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=exportbomb.1172604830@kernel \ --to=apw@shadowen.org \ --cc=akpm@osdl.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).